The Regime of the Synodality in the Eastern Church of the First Millennium and Its Canonical Basis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/EaL.2019.07.02Keywords:
synodality, synodality regime, canonical baseAbstract
The synodal form of organisation — sought and established for His Church by Her Founder, that is, by Our Lord Jesus Christ, and affirmed by His Apostles — was also expressly reaffirmed by the canonical legislation of the Eastern Church of the first millennium. By adapting the form of administrative-territorial organisation of the Church to that of the Roman State — sanctioned by the canons of the Ecumenical Synods (cf. can. 4, 6 Sin. I Ec.; 2, 6 Sin. II Ec.; 9, 17, 28 Sin. IV Ec.; 36 Sin. VI Ec.) — in the life of the Eastern Church several types of synods appeared, starting with the eparchial (metropolitan) synod of a local Church and ending with the patriarchal synod, both still present in the autocephalous Churches of Eastern Orthodoxy.
References
Bibliography
Canons of the Orthodox Church. Notes and Comments (Canoanele Bisericii Ortodoxe. Note şi comentarii), ed. I. N. Floca, Sibiu, 1992.
Doxapatriu N.: The Order of the Patriarchal Sees (Ordinea Scaunelor patriarhale), II, translated by C. Erbiceanu. “Biserica Ortodoxă Română”, XXX (1906—1907), pp. 1339—1354.
Dură I. V.: Les „Tomes synodaux” émis par le Patriarcat œcuménique au XIXe et au XXe siècles pour octroyer l’autonomie ou l’autocéphalie à des Églises orthodoxes. “Revue des Études Sud-Est Européennes”, XXXII, 1—2 (1994), pp. 63—66.
Dură N. V.: “Petrine Primacy”: The Role of the Bishop of Rome according to the Canonical Legislation of the Ecumenical Councils of the First Millennium. An Ecclesiological-Canonical Evaluation. In: The Petrine Ministry: Catholics and Orthodox in Dialogue: Academic Symposium held at the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, ed. W. Kasper, New York, Newman Press, 2006, pp. 164—18.
Dură N. V.: “Scythia Mynor” (Dobrudja) and its Apostolic Church. The Archiepiscopal and Metropolitan See of Tomis (4th—14 thcenturies) („Scythia Mynor” (Dobrogea) şi Biserica ei apostolică. Scaunul arhiepiscopal şi mitropolitan al Tomisului (sec. IV—XIV)), Ed. Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucharest, 2006.
Dură N. V.: Canonical Legislation of the II Ecumenical Synod and its Importance for the Organization and Discipline of the Church (Legislaţia canonică a Sinodului II ecumenic şi importanţa sa pentru organizarea şi disciplina Bisericii). “Glasul Bisericii”, XL, 6—8 (1981), pp. 630—671.
Dură N. V.: Christianism in Pontic Dacia. The „Scythian Monks” (Daco-Roman) and their Contribution to the Advance of Ecumenical Unity and the Development of the European Christian Humanist Culture. “Revue Roumaine d’Histoire”, 1—4 (2003), pp. 5—18.
Dură N. V.: Denis Exiguus (Le Petit) (465—545). Précisions et correctifs concernant sa vie et son oeuvre. “Revista Española de Derecho Canonico”, L (1993), pp. 279—290.
Dură N. V.: Dionysius Exiguus and the Popes of Rome (Dionisie Exiguul şi Papii Romei). “Biserica Ortodoxă Română”, CXXI, 7—12 (2003), pp. 459—468.
Dură N. V.: Forms and Manifestations of the Autocephaly of the Romanian Orthodox Church. Historical, Ecclesiological and Canonical Testimonies (Forme şi stări de manifestare ale autocefaliei Bisericii Ortodoxe Române. Mărturii istorice, ecleziologice şi canonice). In: Autocefalia: libertate şi demnitate, Ed. Basilica, Bucharest, 2010, pp. 113—155.
Dură N. V.: From the Judicial-Canonical Institution of the Pentarchy to Renouncing the Title of “Patriarch of the West” (De la instituţia juridico-canonică a Pentarhiei la renunţarea titlului de „Patriarh al Occidentului”). In: Autocefalia, libertate şi demnitate, Ed. Basilica, Bucharest, 2010, pp. 455—479.
Dură N. V.: Le „Primat pétrinien”. Le rôle de l’Évèque de Rome selon la législation canonique des conciles oecuméniques du premier millénaire. Une évaluation canonique-ecclésiologique. In: Il Ministero petrino. Cattolici e ortodossi in dialogo, ed. Walter Kasper (Città Nuova Editrice), Roma, 2004, pp. 171—201.
Dură N. V.: Le Concile des Apôtres, prototype de tous les conciles, modèle de la synodalité orthodoxe. “La Lumière du Thabor”, 49—50 (2003), pp. 61—84.
Dură N. V.: Le Régime de la synodalité dans les huit premières siècles. Les types des synods. “L’Année Canonique (Hors Série)”, I (1992), pp. 267—283.
Dură N. V.: Le Régime de la synodalité selon la législation canonique, conciliaire, oecuménique, du Ier millénaire, Ed. Ametist 92, Bucharest, 1999.
Dură N. V.: Patriarch and Patriarchate. Patriarchate, one of the old European Institutions (Patriarh şi Patriarhie. Patriarhia, una din vechile Instituţii europene). “Biserica Ortodoxă Română”, CIII, 1—3 (2005), pp. 414—432.
Dură N. V.: The Bishop of Rome and his Canonical Status. The Apostolic See of Rome and the Process of Restoring Ecumenical Christian Unity (Episcopul Romei şi statutul său canonic. Scaunul apostolic al Romei şi procesul de refacere a unităţii creştine ecumenice). In: Ortodoxia românească şi rolul ei în Mişcarea ecumenică. De la New Delhi la Porto Alegre 1961—2006, Ed. Vasiliana ’98, Iași, 2006, pp. 89—118.
Dură N. V.: The Byzantine Nomocanons, Fundamental Sources of the Old Romanian Law. In: Exploration, Education and Progress in the Third Millennium, I, 3 (2011), Galaţi University Press, Galaţi, pp. 25—48.
Dură N. V.: The Edict of Milan (313) and its Impact on the Relations between the State and the Church. Some Historical, Legal and Ecclesiological Consid-The erations (Edictul de la Milan (313) şi impactul lui asupra relaţiilor dintre Stat şi Biserică. Câteva consideraţii istorice, juridice şi ecleziologice). “Mitropolia Olteniei”, 5—8 (2012), pp. 28—43.
Dură N. V.: The Legal and Canonical Institution of the Patriarchate and its Ecclesiological Implications. From the Diarchic Type of Leadership to the Pentarchic, and then Tetrarchic (Instituţia juridico-canonică a Patriarhatului şi implicaţiile i ecleziologice. De la sistemul de conducere de tip diarhic la cel pentarhic, şi apoi la cel tetrarhic). “Revista de Teologie Sfântul Apostol Andrei”, XV, 1 (2011), pp. 21—51.
Dură N. V.: The Monks, the third Constituent Element of the Church (Monahii, al treilea element constitutiv al Bisericii). “Biserica Ortodoxă Română”, CXXI, 7—12 (2003), pp. 469—483.
Dură N. V.: The New Canon Code of the Catholic Church. Remarks of Catholic Canonists and Ecclesiologists (Noul Cod canonic al Bisericii Catolice. Reflecţii ale canoniştilor şi ecleziologilor catolici). “Ortodoxia”, XXXV, 4 (1983), pp. 621—625.
Dură N. V.: The Organization of the Ethiopian Church and its Canonical Basis (Organizarea Bisericii etiopiene şi bazele ei canonice), Ed. IMBOR, Bucharest, 1990.
Dură N. V.: The ‘Scythian Monks’ (Daco-Roman) and their Contribution to the European Christian Humanist Culture. In: Dialogue of Civilizations, ed. D. Muskhelishvili, New York, Nova Science Publishers, 2010, pp. 33—42.
Dură N. V., Mititelu C.: Canonic Legislation and European Legal-Canonical Institutions in the First Millennium (Legislaţia canonică şi instituţiile juridicocanonice europene, din primul mileniu), Ed. Universitară, Bucharest, 2014.
Dură N. V., Mititelu C.: The State and the Church in IV—VI Centuries. The Roman Emperor and the Christian Religion. In: SGEM Conference on Political Sciences, Law, Finance, Economics & Tourism, I (2014), Albena, pp. 923—930.
Eid E.: La Synodalité dans la Tradition orientale. “Ephemerides Juris Canonici”, XLVIII, 1—2 (1992), p. 18—25.
Ivan I.: Ethnos — the Nation — Divine Basis and Fundamental Canonical Principle of Church Autocephaly (Etnosul — neamul — temei divin și principiu fundamental canonic al autocefaliei bisericeşti). In: Autocefalia: libertate şi demnitate, Ed. Basilica, Bucharest, 2010, pp. 26—34.
Ivan I.: Relations between the Local Autocephalous Orthodox Churches and with the Ecumenical Patriarchate according to Canons and History (Raporturile Bisericilor ortodoxe autocefale locale între ele şi faţă de Patriarhia ecumenică după canoane şi istorie). “Mitropolia Moldovei și Sucevei”, XLIX, 7—8 (1973), pp. 465—478.
Ivan I.: The Importance of the Fundamental Canonical Principles of Organization and Administration, for the Unity of the Church (Importanţa principiilor fundamentale canonice de organizaţie şi administraţie, pentru unitatea Bisericii). “Mitropolia Moldovei şi Sucevei”, 3—4 (1969), pp. 155—165.
Kvesitadze G., Dură N. V.: The Roots of the Georgian and Romanian Science and Culture, Ed. Academiei Oamenilor de Ştiinţă din România, Bucharest, 2017.
Les conciles œcuméniques. Les décrets de Nicée I à Latran V. Tome II—1. Texte établi par G. Alberigo et al., Ed. Française sous la direction de A. Duval et. al., Ed. Cerf. Paris.
Lupu Ş.: Synodality and / or Conciliarity: an Expression of Church Unity and Catholicity (Sinodalitatea şi / sau conciliaritatea: expresie a unităţii şi catolicităţii Bisericii). “Dialog teologic”, IV, 7 (2001), pp. 31—49.
Mititelu C.: “Corpus Juris Civilis” and “Corpus Juris Canonici”. Legal and Canonical Considerations. “Teologia”, XVIII, 4 (61), 2014, pp. 127—137.
Mititelu C.: Dacian-Roman Cultural Personalities from Scythia Minor (4th—6th Centuries) and Their Contribution to the Affirmation and Promotion of a Humanistic-Christian Culture at European Level. In: New Approaches in Social and Humanistic Sciences, Iași & London, 2018, ed. V. Manolachi, C. Rus, S. Rusnac, pp. 316—331.
Mititelu C.: Saint John Cassian The Founder of Occidental Monasticism. “Christian Researches”, VI (2011), pp. 32—49.
Mititelu C.: The Byzantine Law and its Reception in the Printed Rules in Wallachia of the 17th Century (Dreptul bizantin şi receptarea lui în Pravilele tipărite, în Ţările Române, din secolul al XVII-lea), Ed. Universitară, Bucharest, 2014.
Mititelu C.: The Byzantine Law and its Reception in the Romanian Principalities. “Philosophical-Theological Reviewer”, 4 (2014), pp. 33—43.
Mititelu C.: The Christian Emperors of “Old Rome” and “New Rome” — “Defensores et Protectores Ecclesiae” (Defenders and Protectors of the Church). “Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences”, XII, 4 (2018), pp. 202—211.
Mititelu C.: The Legislation of Emperor Justinian (527—565) and its Reception in the Carpathian-Danubian-Pontic Space. “Analecta Cracoviensia”, 48 (2016), pp. 383—397.
Muntean V.: Les relations byzantino-roumaines au Moyen Âge. Nouvelles precisions. “Études byzantines et post-byzantines”, IV (2001), pp. 167—180.
New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law, ed. by J. P. Beal et al., Ed. Paulist Press, New York, 2000.
Păcurariu M.: Some Considerations on the Age of “Autocephaly” of the Romanian Orthodox Church (Câteva consideraţii cu privire la vechimea „autocefaliei”
Bisericii Ortodoxe Române). In: Autocefalia: libertate şi demnitate, Ed. Basilica, Bucharest, 2010, pp. 101—112.
Pidalion (The Rudder), ed. Agapie and Nicodim, Athens, 1990.
Pulpea I.: Bishop Valentinian of Tomis. His Correspondence with Pope Vigilius on “The Three Chapters” (Episcopul Valentinian de Tomis. Coresponden a lui cu papa Vigiliu în chestiunea „Celor Trei Capitole”). “Biserica Ortodoxă Română”, LXV, 4—6 (1974), pp. 200—212.
Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, ed. P. Schaff and. H. Wace, second series, vol. 14, SAGE Software Albany, Oregon 1996 (http://www.agape-biblia.org/orthodoxy/The%20Seven%20Ecumenical%20Councils.pdf) (Accessed: 24.02.2019).
Stan L.: About Autocephaly (Despre autocefalie). “Ortodoxia”, VIII 3 (1956), pp. 369—396.
Stan L.: Autocephaly and Autonomy in the Orthodox Church (Autocefalia și autonomia în Biserica Ortodoxă). “Mitropolia Moldovei și Sucevei”, XXXVIII (1962), pp. 567—579.
Stan L.: Laymen in the Church (Mirenii în Biserică), Sibiu, 1939.
Stan L.: The Origin of Autocephaly and Autonomy (Obârşia autocefaliei şi autonomiei). “Mitropolia Olteniei”, XIII, 1—4 (1961), pp. 80—113.
Stăniloae D.: Theological Bases of the Hierarchy and its Synodality (Temeiurile teologice ale ierarhiei și ale sinodalităţii ei). “Studii Teologice”, XXII, 3—4 (1970), pp. 165—174.
Statute for the Organization and Functioning of the Romanian Orthodox Church (Statutul pentru organizarea și funcţionarea Bisericii Ortodoxe Române). Ed. IMBOR, Bucharest, 2008.
Stavrou M.: L’autorité ecclésiale dans le monde byzantine. “Contacts”, 202 (2003), pp. 148—179.
Stavrou M.: Linéaments d’une théologie orthodoxe de la conciliarité. “Irenikon”, 4 (2003), pp. 470—505.
The Holy and Great Synod: The Relations of the Orthodox Church with the world of Christianity (Official Document), apud https://basilica.ro/sfantul-si-marele-sinod-relatiile-ortodox-ortodox-cu-sambul-lumii-crestine-document- official (accessed: 3.02.2019).
The Novels of Justinian. A Complete Annotated English Translation, ed. by D. J. D. Miller, P. Sarris, vol. II, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
The Syntagma of the Divine and Sacred Canons (Athenian Syntagma), ed. G. A. Rhalli, M. Potli, vol. II—III, Atena, 1852—1853.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
