Does Philosophical Counselling Need Answers to Philosophical Questions? Polemical Review of Helena Kistelska’s Doctoral Dissertation “Philosophical counseling. Problems – theses – controversies”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/fp.16023Keywords:
philosophical counselling, psychotherapy, anthropologyAbstract
The review presents the main theses of Helena Kistelska’s doctoral dissertation devoted to discussing the problem of the specificity of philosophical counselling in relation to other disciplines concerned with supporting human development. Kistelska has provided an extensive critique of philosophical counselling. She has accused it of lacking a coherent anthropological concept that could function as a theory of counselling. Such a thesis appears problematic in light of the understanding of the nature and function of philosophy. Developing a counselling practice can – as has been tried to demonstrate – be based on recognizing the dynamics of the historical process of philosophy. Such a process of searching without definitive answers provides a model for the counselling and reveals the essence of its philosophical nature.
References
Abramovitch H.: The Influence of Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue on Psychotherapy: His Lasting Contribution. W: Dialogue as a Trans-disciplinary Concept: Martin Buber’s Philosophy of Dialogue and its Contemporary Reception. Ed. P. Mendes-Flohr. De Gruyter, Berlin 2015, s. 169–182. Pobrano z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbj7kb3.13 [12.07.2022].
Amir L.B.: Three Questionable Assumptions of Philosophical Counseling. „International Journal of Philosophical Practice” 2004, vol. 1, issue 2, s. 58–81. https://doi.org/10.5840/ijpp2004214.
Chrząstowski S., Barbaro B. de: Postmodernistyczne inspiracje w psychoterapii. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków 2011.
Frank J.D., Frank J.B.: Perswazja i uzdrawianie. Analiza porównawcza psychoterapii. Tłum. H. Grzegołowska-Klarkowska. Instytut Psychologii Zdrowia. Polskie Towarzystwo Psychologiczne, Warszawa 2005.
Kistelska H.: Doradztwo filozoficzne: problemy – tezy – kontrowersje. Praca doktorska. Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski, 2019 [maszynopis].
Lahav R.: Using Analytic Philosophy in Philosophical Counselling. „Journal of Applied Philosophy” 1993, vol. 10, s. 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.1993.tb00080.x.
Rosińska Z.: Psychoterapia i filozofia. W: Psychoterpia. [T.] 7: Pogranicza. Red. L. Grzesiuk, H. Suszek. Eneteia. Wydawnictwo Psychologii i Kultury, Warszawa 2012, s. 147–174.
Wolicki M.: Podstawy filozoficzne analizy egzystencjalnej i logoterapii. Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu, Wrocław 2001.
Woszczyk A.: Consolatio or Critical Methods? Reflection on Philosophical Counseling. W: Thinking Critically: What Does It Mean? The Tradition of Philosophical Criticism and Its Forms in the European History of Ideas. Ed. D. Kubok. De Gruyter, Berlin–Boston 2019, s. 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/ 9783110567472-017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
