Von Marburg nach Pittsburgh: Anschauung in der Struktur der Erfahrung
Abstract
Der Aufsatz rückt das Problem der Konstitution der kognitiven Erfahrung in den Vordergrund. Es werden zwei Lösungen dieses Problems analysiert, die von Cassirer und McDowell vorgeschlagen wurden. Beide Autoren gehen von Kants Erfahrungstheorie aus und entwickeln selbständige Interpretationen dieser je nach ihrer Schulzugehörigkeit. Obwohl McDowell seine Argumentation auf der Basis der analytischen Philosophie entfaltet, zeigt sie eine gewisse Ähnlichkeit mit der von Cassirer. Auf die Aufzeigung der Gemeinsamkeiten und der Unterschiede der Denkstrategien, die den Rahmen der jeweiligen Traditionen überschreiten, ist der Aussatz gerichtet.
Keywords: Erfahrung, Anschauung, Begriff, repräsentativer Inhalt
The paper focuses on the problem of constitution of our cognitive experience. Two
approaches to this problem proposed by Cassirer and McDowell are central for the analysis.
Both authors use Kant’s theory of cognition as a foundation for their own conceptions und
they develop their independent interpretations of it according to the traditions they belong to.
Although McDowell’s interpretation emerged within analytical philosophy, we can see
similarity with Cassirer’s theory. Comparative investigation of these theories should point out
the convergences and divergences between them.
Keywords: Experience, intuition, conception, representational content
References
Cassirer, Ernst, Zur Logik des Symbolbegriffs (1938), in: Ernst Cassirer, Wesen und Wirkung
des Symbolbegriffs. Darmstadt, 1976, 201–230.
Cassirer, Ernst, Das Symbolproblem und seine Stellung im System der Philosophie, in: Ernst
Cassirer, Symbol, Technik, Sprache: Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1927–1933. Hamburg, 1985.
Cassirer, Ernst, Die Kantischen Elemente in Wilhelm von Humboldts Sprachphilosophie
(1923), in: Ernst Cassirer, Geist und Leben. Schriften zu den Lebensordnungen von Natur und
Kunst, Geschichte und Sprache. Leipzig, 1993.
Cassirer, Ernst: Zur Theorie des Begriffs, in: Ernst Cassirer, Erkenntnis, Begriff, Kultur.
Hamburg, 1993a.
Cassirer, Ernst, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen (1923). Bd. 1. Darmstadt, 1994.
Cassirer, Ernst, Philosophie der symbolischen Formen (1929). Bd. 3. Darmstadt, 1994.
Davidson, Donald, On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme, in: Proceedings and Addresses
of the American Philosophical Association 47, 1973–74 (New York 1974), 5-20.
Husserl, Edmund, Kartesianische Meditationen. Leipzig, 1995.
Kant, Immanuel, Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg, 1998.
Loidolt, Sophie, Die Wiederentdeckung der Erfahrung als Weltoffenheit: McDowells „Mind
and World“ mit Seitenblicken auf Husserl und Kant, in: Petr Urban, Geburt der
Phänomenologie. Edmund Husserl zu Ehren, Prague: Filosoficky časopis 2010, 149–166.
McDowell, John, Conceptual Capacities of Perception, in: John McDowell, Having the World
in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge, 2009.
McDowell, John, Geist und Welt. Frankfurt am Main, 2012.
Renz, Ursula, Von Marburg nach Pittsburgh: Philosophie als Transzendentalphilosophie, in:
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 59 (2) 2011, 249–270.
Rickert, Heinrich, Unmittelbarkeit und Sinndeutung. Tübingen, 1939.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
