Together or not? The Effects of Individual and Group Work of the Faculty of Philology Students During E-learning Online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2023.9.1.02Ключевые слова:
assignment, assessment, MOODLE, risk, colleaguesАннотация
This article tested a widespread belief that by working in groups distance education students achieve cognitive goals of learning, and develop their social competencies and skills. The subject of the study was the achievements of 655 bachelor and master degree students enrolled in 22 on-campus and blended learning
units offered within 2 university courses, full-time and part-time, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, i.e. in the academic years 2020/2021 and 2021/2022. An instrumental case study was carried out: the grades students obtained for individual work were compared with grades obtained for work done in pairs and groups of threes within the same courses. It was found that a statistically significant difference did not exist. But the highest grades (on average 83.81) were obtained by students who had worked individually, and the lowest (81.64%) by those who had worked in groups of three. The highest grades were obtained by the final-year students. They showed an understanding of the assessment criteria and the ability to follow such. Also, they wanted to pass on the first attempt in order to have time to prepare for the final examination. International students were reluctant to work in groups. They focused on achieving good grades and preparing for the thesis due to the time limits of student visas and the unrest caused by the war in Ukraine. First-year students who had no experience in adhering to the assessment criteria and problems with
communicating due to isolation caused by the pandemic obtained the lowest grades.
Библиографические ссылки
Bernier, A., & Stenstrom, Ch. (2016). Moving from chance and „chemistry” to skills: Improving online student learning outcomes in small group collaboration. Education for Information, 32, 55–69.
Chang, B., & Kang, H. (2016). Challenges facing group work online. Distance Education, 37(1), 73–88, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1100764 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Chatti, M.A., Jarke, M., & Quix, C. (2010). Connectivism: The network metaphor of learning. International Journal of Learning Technology, 5(1), 80–99, http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2010.031617 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson, ISBN-13: 978-0-13-136739-5 (alk. paper), ISBN-10: 0-13-136739-0 (alk. paper).
De Martino, M., Kovalenko, S., Tkach, G., & Isidori, E. (2022). Education and social networking: Between connectivism and the critical social philosophy of the new media. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 22(1), 137–149, https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-1-137-149 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Duke, B., Harper, G., & Johnson, M. (2013). Connectivism as a Digital Age learning theory. The International HET Review, Special Issue, 4–13, https://www.hetl.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/HETLReview2013SpecialIssue.pdf (accessed 12.12.2022).
Ellis, R., & Han, F. (2021). Assessing university student collaboration in new ways. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 4(46), 509–524. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02602938.2020.1788504 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Elzainy, A., Sadik, A.E, & Abdulmonem, W.A. (2020). Experience of e-learning and online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the College of Medicine, Qassim University. Journal of Tabah University Medical Sciences, 6, 456–462, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.09.005 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Fernandes, T.A., & Caetano, F.J.P. (2020). Perception of the students’ learning and evaluation process in an e-learning course in Food Preservation Technology: a study case in a Food Consumption MSc. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 695–715, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09611-z (accessed 12.12.2022).
Gibson, D., Irving, L., & Seifert, T. (2019). Assessing Personal Learning in Online, Collaborative Problem Solving. In M. Shonfeld, & D. Gibson (Eds.), Collaborative Learning in a Global World. A volume in literacy, language and learning (pp. 231–248). New York: Information Age Publishing INC., Charlotte, ISBN-13: 978-1641134651, ISBN-10: 1641134658.
Gurba, K. (2021). Individual and Collaborative Online Learning – Reasonable Compromise. International Journal of Research in E-learning, 7, 1–17, https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/IJREL/article/view/12534 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Hatalska, N. (n.d.). Coworking. Infuture . Retrieved from https://infuture.institute/raporty/coworking-i-want-it-that-way (accessed 28.12.2022).
Hatalska, N. (2021). Wiek paradoksów. Czy technologia nas ocali? [The age of paradoxes. Will technology save us?]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Haugland, M.J., Rosenberg, I., &, Aasekjer, K. (2022). Collaborative learning in small groups in an online course – a case study. BMC Medical Education, 22(165), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03232-x (accessed 12.12.2022).
Kojs, W. (2001). Kilka uwag o przedmiocie badań dydaktycznych [A few remarks on the subject of didactic research]. Edukacyjne Dyskursy, http://edukacyjne.dyskursy.univ.szczecin.pl/kilka.htm (accessed 30.12.2022).
Luttwak, E.N. (2000). Turbo-capitalism. Winners and loosers in the global economy. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN-10: 006093137X, ISBN-13: 978-0060931377.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. ISBN: 9781412972123.
Saraiva A.C.M.B., & Silva N.S.A. (2021). The COVID-19 impact on online education – opportunities and challenges in a SWOT analysis. International Journal of Research in E-learning, 7(2), 1–18, https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2021.7.2.03 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Seery, A. (2010). Education, the formation of self and the world of Web 2.0. London Review of Education, 8(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460903557779 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Senejko, A., Godawa, G., Gurba, E., Kaluś, A. & Gurba, K. (2022) Growth-Related Responses to the Threat of COVID-19 among Adolescents, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912597 (accessed 29.12.2022).
Serrano, J.M., & Pons, R.M. (2014). Introduction: Cooperative Learning. Annales de Psicologica, 3, 781–784. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.20151 (accessed 29.09.2022).
Siemens, G. (2004). A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from https://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm (accessed 12.12.2022).
Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge, https://archive.org/details/KnowingKnowledge/page/n7/mode/2up (accessed 12.12.2022).
Słomczyński, M., & Sidor, D. (2012) Niepowodzenia edukacyjne w kształceniu zdalnym [Educational failures in remote learning], E-mentor 5(47), https://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/mobi/artykul/index/numer/47/id/970 (accessed 30.12.2022).
Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.) The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. ISBN 978-1-4833-4980-0.
Stowarzyszenie E-learningu Akademickiego (2008). Kryteria oceny kursu internetowego [Criteria for assessing the online course]. Retrieved from https://sea.edu.pl/kryteria/?page=obszary (accessed 12.12.2022).
Stoyanova, F., & Krämer, N.C. (2020). Carrot-and Stick Procedure without Carrots: Vicarious Punishment Prompts and System Transparency in E-learning Groups. Proceedings from the 18th International Conference e-Society 2020. Lisbon: International Association for Development of the Information Society (pp. 99-110). ISBN: 978-989-8704-14-6. https://www.sciencegate.app/app/document/download#10.33965/es2020_202005l03 (accessed 29.12.2022).
Tedeschi, R.G., Shakespeare-Finch, J., Taku, K., & Calhoun, L.G. (2018). Posttraumatic Growth: Theory, Research, and Applications. London: Routledge. ISBN 9781138675049.
Vrasidas, C., & Zembylas, M. (2003). The nature of technology-mediated interaction in globalized distance education. International Journal of Training and Development 7(4), 1–16. Online ISSN 1468-2419. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-3736.2003.00186.x (accessed 12.12.2022).
Wendell, W. (2022). Student’s perspectives of group work: the case of Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 4, 475-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1985978 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Xie, X., Siau, K., & Fui-Hoon Nah, F. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic – online education in the new normal and the next normal. Journal of Information Technology Case an Application Research, 22(3), 175‒187. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2020.1824884 (accessed 12.12.2022).
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
