The Appeal of Gamification for Master’s Students of Science and Technology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2023.9.1.03

Keywords:

gamification, ESP, technical English, cognitivism, soft skills

Abstract

Universities can offer their master’s students who want to improve their language skills different learning environments. They can range from traditional classes to online programmes equivalent to an on-campus experience or reaching beyond it. Learning technical English through a curriculum that is inspiring and stimulating due to authentic materials used in a gamified setting can result in positive learning outcomes and increased satisfaction levels among lecturers and students. The former can find new challenges helping prevent burnout, the latter have the chance to develop hard and soft skills, including analytical, reflective and critical thinking, through context-specific language. Interactions structured around online activities which involve searching for information in authentic resources and completing activities that allow for progress to the next level can effectively prepare students for challenges they will encounter in their professional life. They can also capture imagination and unlock the creative potential of the educators involved in their development and of participants bored with school routine and textbooks. Thus, a gamified language course for specific purposes can become a highly motivating environment, in which young people develop their creativity, language proficiency and knowledge of technological advances not only in the fields of their interest; they are also exposed to new learning practices due to the application of game-design elements. The ideas presented above will be supported by students’ opinions and attitudes expressed during a pilot Moodle course in a gamified format conducted at Gdansk University of Technology in the summer semester of 2021/2022.

References

Cardinot, A., & Fairfield, J.A. (2022). Game-based learning to engage students with physics and astronomy using a board game. In Research Anthology on Developments in Gamification and Game-Based Learning (pp. 785–801). IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019010104.

Chans, G.M., & Portuguez Castro, M. (2021). Gamification as a strategy to increase motivation and engagement in higher education chemistry students. Computers, 10(10), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10100132.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (eight edition). Abingdon, Oxon. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539.

Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J.M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & education, 59(2), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004.

Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., Talaee, E., & Noroozi, O. (2021). Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: a systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 934–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298 .

Donelan, H., K. Kear & Ramage, M. (2010). Online communication and collaboration: A reader. London, New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780415564786.

Gros, B. (2007). Digital games in education: The design of games-based learning environments. Journal of research on technology in education, 40(1), 23–38.

Hainey, T., Westera, W., Connolly, T.M., Boyle, L., Baxter, G., Beeby, R.B., & Soflano, M. (2013). Students’ attitudes toward playing games and using games in education: Comparing Scotland and the Netherlands. Computers & Education, 69, 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.023.

Kalisz, R., & Kubiński, W. (1996). Categories of game and sport discipline. An exercise in prototype description. In K.A. Sroka (Ed.) Kognitive Aspekte der Sprache, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 115–120.

Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A.I. (2021). Gamification in science education. A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022.

Kołodziejczak, B., Mokwa-Tarnowska, I. & Roszak, M. (2017). Autentyczność na zajęciach zwiększających kompetencje w użyciu specjalistycznego języka angielskiego [Authenticity in developing English for specific purposes]. Linguodidactica, tom XXI, 147–163. http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6747.

Kövecses, Z. (2005). A broad view of cognitive linguistics. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 52(2–3), 135–172. Print: ISSN 2559-8201; Online: ISSN 2560-1016.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Miller, C.T. (Ed.). (2008). Games: Purpose and potential in education. Springer Science & Business Media.

Mokwa-Tarnowska, I. (2017). E-learning i blended learning w nauczaniu akademickim: zagadnienia metodyczne [E-Learning and blended learning in academic education: teaching aspects]. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej. ISBN/ISSN: 978-83-7348-613-3.

Mokwa-Tarnowska, I. (2018). Rozwijanie umiejętności miękkich na zajęciach wspomaganych narzędziami online – kurs języka angielskiego technicznego [Developing soft skills during web-enhanced classes – Technical English course]. Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Elektrotechniki i Automatyki PG. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo PG. 58, 51–56. ISSN 2353-1290.

Mokwa-Tarnowska, I., & Tarnowska, V. (2022). The Impact of support for language development in online classes at Gdansk University of Technology during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research in E-learning, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2022.8.1.04.

Pan, Y., Ke, F., & Xu, X. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning games in fostering mathematics education in K-12 settings. Educational Research Review, 100448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100448

Peterson, M., White, J., Mirzaei, M.S., & Wang, Q. (2022). A review of research on the application of digital games in foreign language education. Research Anthology on Developments in Gamification and Game-Based Learning, 1948–1971. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2591-3.ch004 .

Reinfried, M. (2000). Can radical constructivism achieve a viable basis for foreign language teaching? – A refutation of the ‘Wolff-Wendt’ theorem. EESE 8/2000. Retrieved from http://webdoc.gwdg.de/edoc/ia/eese/artic20/marcus/8_2000.html (accessed 04.10.2022).

Rincon-Flores, E.G., & Santos-Guevara, B.N. (2021). Gamification during Covid-19: Promoting active learning and motivation in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7157.

Saxena, M., & Mishra, D.K. (2021). Gamification and Gen Z in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Literature. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 17(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa10.

Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Games & Simulation, 2(1), 49–62. ISSN 1477-2043.

Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2003). Harnessing the power of games in education. Insight, 3(1), 5–33. ISSN 2156-4868.

Udeozor, C., Toyoda, R., Russo Abegão, F., & Glassey, J. (2022). Digital games in engineering education: systematic review and future trends. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2093168.

Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophische Untersuchungen, Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-40 51-5929-6.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-23

How to Cite

Mokwa-Tarnowska, I., Tarnowska, V., & Roszak, M. (2023). The Appeal of Gamification for Master’s Students of Science and Technology. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2023.9.1.03

Issue

Section

Articles