Corporate Digital Responsibility New Challenges to the Social Sciences

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2019.5.1.01

Keywords:

corporate social responsibility, corporate digital responsibility, technology, artificial intelligence

Abstract

Contemporary practitioners and scientists more and more frequently highlight the extraordinarily rapid process of implementation of new technologies – including those based on artificial intelligence – and unpredictable consequences of such actions. Therefore, it is important to be an active participant in the debate on the relation between human and modern technologies, a debate based on interdisciplinary scientific knowledge. The article refers to selected ideas related to knowledge management, organisational learning, knowledge area, or innovation environment. The challenge which social science researchers face, next to examining the theoretical aspects, is the application of various calculation methods and new technologies to make quicker and easier decisions in social contexts – with regard to various groups of people, e.g. employees, customers, or voters. Apart from the new methods, another serious challenge is to raise social awareness regarding the digital responsibility in certain groups such as managers or, more generally, employers and employees. The responsibility of the elite and scientific authorities should consist in instilling awareness in one another and approaching the new phenomenon with care. Potential threats may completely change our civilisation. The presented discussion is based on literature study which included selected theories and reports of research centres and scientific bodies. A particularly interesting case study discussed in this article includes TOP CDR initiative and a report prepared by SW RESEARCH agency in cooperation with Procontent public relations and digital marketing agency. The conclusions of this report indicate that corporate digital responsibility (CDR) may be a pioneering area for in-depth empirical studies. The nature of the topic, despite being clearly related to sociology, requires interdisciplinary approach and cooperation of numerous circles, not only scientific ones.

References

Cooke, P. G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy, 26, I.4-5, 475-491.

Dokument Programowy TOP CDR. Retrieved from http://www.wns.us.edu.pl/pl/788-rada-ekspertow-programu-top-cdr-digital-responsible-company

Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge-Worker Productivity. The Biggest Challenge. In: California Review Management, 41/2, 79–94.

Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning Region. Futures, 27(5), 527-536.

Galwas, B. (2010). Edukacja w przyszłości i przyszłość edukacji. Edu@Kcja. Magazyn Edukacji Elektronicznej, 1, 9–32.

Gawron, G. & Suchacka, M. (2018). Regional identity in the perspective of corporate social responsibility – sociological considerations. In: M. S. Szczepański, W. Tomala-Kania, & Z. Zagała (Eds.), Identity Narratives. Interdysciplinary Perspectives. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.

Green Paper – Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (2001). Commission of the European Communities, Brussels. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2001/EN/1-2001-366-EN-1-0.Pdf

Matteaccioli, A. T. (2006). Historique du GREMI – La apports du GREMI a l’analyse territoriale del’innovation. Milieux innovateurs. Theorie et politiques. Paris: Oconomica Anthropos.

Micklethwait, J. & Wooldridge, A. (2000). Szamani zarządzania, Poznań: Zysk i S-ka Wydawnictwo s.c.

Morze, N. & Buinytska, O. (2016). E-learning Managers Training to Design High-tech Electronic Learning Environment. International Journal of Research in E-learning, (2), 11–27.

Morze, N. (2016). Introduction. In: Morze, N. (Ed.), Open educational e-environment of modern university. Collected scientific works (2), 7–10.

Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (2000). Kreowanie wiedzy w organizacji, Warszawa: Poltext.

Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 11,12, 77–90.

Przegląd Strategii Rozwoju Sztucznej Inteligencji na Świecie (2018). Warszawa: Fundacja Digital Poland I Edition.

Rallet, A. & Torre, A. (2007). Quelles proximites pour innover? Paris: L’Harmatta.

Raport America’s Top Fears (2018). Chapman University Survey of American Fears, Retrieved from https://blogs.chapman.edu/wilkinson/2018/10/16/americas-top-fears-2018/

Russell, S. J. & Norvig, P. (2003). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Senge, P. M. (2004). Piąta dyscyplina. Teoria i praktyka organizacji uczących się, Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna.

Suchacka, M. (2014). Transformacja regionu przemysłowego w kierunku regionu wiedzy. Studium socjologiczne województwa śląskiego. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytet Śląski.

Suchacka, M. & Horáková, N. (2019). Towards Artificial Intelligence. Sociological reflections on the relationship man – organization – device. In: R. Ulewicz & R. R. Nikolić (Eds.), System Safety: Human – Technical Facility – Environment (pp. 912–921). Częstochowa: De Gruyter.

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind LIX (236), 433–460.

White Paper on a European Communication Policy, of the European Communities Brussels (2006). Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/documents/comm/white_papers/pdf/com2006_35_en.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-01

How to Cite

Suchacka, M. (2019). Corporate Digital Responsibility New Challenges to the Social Sciences. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 5(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2019.5.1.01

Issue

Section

Articles