Online Collaborative Learning to Enhance Educational Outcomes of English Language Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2020.6.2.05Keywords:
web-enhanced language learning, online tools, hard and soft skills, e-learning, university education, collaborative projectAbstract
With various aims and objectives, syllabi of e-learning, blended learning and webenhanced courses meant for a particular group of undergraduates or postgraduates, may vary substantially. However different they are, they are likely to show behaviourist ideas embodied in instructional design. A plethora of online tools (text based, image based, multimodal production and collaborative ones) can increase students’ learning experiences, as they offer opportunities for interactions that are not available in a traditional, instructivist classroom setting. Thus, a university language course with web-enhanced components offers more versatile
learning options than face-to-face classes, which may result in students becoming more competent and competitive workers in the years to come. By using online tools such as ThingLink, mural, quip, easel.ly, infogram and venngage to collect and critically analyse data, they learn in a new active way, in a more genuine environment. This way of engaging students helps them to achieve learning outcomes structured around communication, teamwork, media literacy and language skills. These ideas are supported by students’ opinions and attitudes expressed in the surveys conducted at Gdańsk University of Technology in the years 2017–2019.
References
Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Atkin, J. M., Black, P. & Coffey, J. (Eds.). (2005). Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards / Committee on Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press.
Astin, A. W. (2012). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Beall, G. (2016). 8 Key Differences between Gen Z and Millennials. Retrieved from https://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-beall/8-key-differences-between_b_12814200.html? guccounter=1
Bishop, S. K., Dixon, M. R., Moore, J. W., & Lundy, M. P. (2016). Behavioral perspectives on personality. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (1–11). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_962-1
Bloom, B., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals, by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbooks 1 to 3: The cognitive, affective and psychomotor domain. Longmans Green.
Bloom, B. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals – Handbook I: Cognitive domain. McKay.
Clark, D. R. (2004). Bloom’s taxonomy of learning domains. Retrieved from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html
Cowie, B. & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education, 6, 101–116.
Crooks, T. (2001). The validity of formative assessments. Paper presented to the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds, 13–15 September. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001862.htm
Dave, R. H. (1975). Psychomotor levels. In R. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Developing and writing behavioural objectives (pp. 33–34). Educational Innovators Press.
Diogo dos Reis, A., Yakovleva, O., Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., & Morze, N. (2018). From Socratic behaviourism to digital constructivism. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 4(1), 11–28. https://www.journals.us.edu.plcommunica/index.php/IJREL/article/view/8333
Heriot-Watt University. (1999). Lola: Learning about open learning, training manual. Heriot-Watt University.
Issa, T., Issa, Th., & Issa, T. B. (2016). Wiki tool in higher education: An Australian perspective. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 2(1), 11–27. https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/IJREL/article/view/8373
Jordan, A., Carlile, O., & Stack, A. (2008). Approaches to learning: a guide for teachers. Open University Press.
Kemp, N. & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(1278), 1–11. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278
Kołodziejczak, B., Mokwa-Tarnowska, I. & Roszak, M. (2017). Authenticity in developing English for specific purposes. Linguodidactica XXI, 147–163.
Kołodziejczak, B., Roszak, M., Ren-Kurc, A., Kowalewski, W. & Półjanowicz, W. (2015). Communication tools on e-learning portals. In E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (Ed.), IT tools – good practice of effective use in education (pp. 63–80). Studio Noa.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S. & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals – Handbook II: Affective domain. McKay.
Mathur, A. K. (2017). The role of soft skills in enhancing employability of technical graduated: A study. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 8(1), 65–66.
Mokwa-Tarnowska, I., Roszak, M. & Kołodziejczak, B. (2018). Online collaborative projects to enhance soft skills. In E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (Ed.) E-learning and Smart Learning Environment for the Preparation of New Generation Specialists. E-learning Series, vol. 10 (pp. 43–464). Studio Noa.
Mokwa-Tarnowska, I. (2017a). E-learning i blended learning w nauczaniu akademickim: zagadnienia metodyczne. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej.
Mokwa-Tarnowska, I. (2017b). Higher interest, deeper concentration, more satisfaction – Web 2.0 tools to enhance technical English classes. In M. Sowa, J. Krajka (Eds.), Innovations in languages for specific purposes, Innovations en langues sur objectifs spécifiques: Present challenges and future promises, défies actuels et engagements à venir (pp. 156–167). Peter Lang.
Mokwa-Tarnowska, I. (2017c). Web-enhanced project environment. Writing specifications and creating interactive poster presentations. In M. Hrubý (Ed.), Distance learning, simulation and communication 2017, proceedings (selected papers), Brno, May 31–June 2 (pp. 113‒120). University of Defence.
NACE (2019), The four career competencies employers value most. https://www.naceweb.org/careerreadiness/competencies/the-four-career-competencies-employers-value-most/
Noskova, T., Pavlova, T., Yakovleva, O., Gutiérrez-Esteban, P., Martin-Espada, R., Cubo-Delgado, S., Arias-Masa, J., Delicado-Puerto, G., Alonso-Dias, L. & Yuste-Tosina, R. (2017). Some trends of ICT tools application by teachers: A comparative study of Russian and Spanish experience. In E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (Ed.), E-learning vol. 9: Effective development of teachers’ skills in the area of ICT and e-learning (pp. 229–238). Studio Noa.
Rima, H. B., Syeda, T. U. & Lubna, J. R. (2017). The big impact of soft skills in today’s workplace. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(1), 456–463.
Scott, D. (Ed.). (2003). Curriculum studies: Vol. IV Boundaries: subjects, assessment, and evaluation. Routledge Falmer. http://books.google.com/books?id=llc8VhacrD8C&pg=PA203&dq=summative+assessment&cd=3#v=onepage&q=summative%20assessment&f=false
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behaviour of organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. Macmillan.
Widła, H. (2019). Implementation of IT tools as a method of improving language and communication skills of bi- and trilingual students. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 5(2), 33–48. https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/IJREL/article/view/8429
Woo, Y., Mehringer, S., Agostinho S. & Reeves, Th. (2007). Implementing authentic tasks in webbased learning environments. EDUCAUSE Review,3(2007), 36–43 https://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/article-downloads/eqm0735.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
