Influence of public policy actors on the development of eGovernment in the Slovak Republic and other European countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/polpre.2021.29.77-97

Keywords:

administration, citizen, eGovernment, factors, service, public administration

Abstract

Information and communication technologies have undergone substantial development in recent decades. These changes have been manifested not only in the economy, but also in people’s everyday life, as modern technologies have fundamentally transformed working methods, leisure activities, and administrative processes. The strong influence of advanced trends has also left changes in public administration. The international concept of eGovernment has come to the fore, known in Slovakia due to the development of the Internet public services under the “informatization” of public administration. In Slovakia, as well as throughout the world, the primary objective of electronification is to increase the obligations of the state administration, reduce corruption, improve communication within the public administration itself, increase transparency, save finances, eliminate empty bureaucracy, and simplify the contact of citizens with the authorities. eGovernment allows individual states a range of options for delivering public services electronically, such as interactive collaboration or providing information online. In spite of all the advantages brought by information and communication technologies, the Slovak Republic still lags behind in the implementation of computerization in public administration. In the field of electronic public administration, individual processes are constantly influenced primarily by external changes (political), but also by internal changes (organizational). These are precisely the types of changes that can be described as limiting factors for the development of eGovernment. The objective of the present paper is to analyze how public policy actors in three studied countries influence the development and implementation of electronic public administration. The analysis will then culminate in the proposal of appropriate solutions to remove the identified barriers for the conditions of the Slovak Republic.

References

Act No. 300/2008 Coll. On electronic acts and authorized conversion of documents.

Act No. 365/2000 Coll. On public administration information systems and on amendments to certain other acts.

Council of the Government of the Czech Republic. (2000). Akční plán realizace státní informační politiky do konce roku 2012. [Action plan for the implementation of the state information policy until the end of 2012] Government of the Czech Republic. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan040761~1.pdf

Digital administration. (2021). The value of Swiss eGovernment cooperation. https://www.egovernment.ch/en/organisation/e-government-schweiz-kurz-erklart/the-utility-of-egovernment-switzerland/

eGov.sk (2008). Electronic public administration. http://info.egov.sk/node/4

eGovernment (2021) Implementing eID. https://www.egovernment.ch/en/umsetzung/schwerpunktplan/elektronische-identitat

European Commission (2015). eGovernment in Switzerland (January 2015, Edition 9.0). https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/2015-03/egov_in_switzerland_-_january_2015_-_v_9_0_final.pdf

European Commission (2016). eGovernment in Switzerland. (February 2016, Edition 10.0). https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/inline-files/eGovernment%20in%20Switzerland%20-%20February%202016%20-%20Edition%2010_0%20-%20v3_00.pdfHeeks, R. (2006). Implementing and Managing eGovernment: An International Text. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Jouzbarkand, M., Khodadadi, M., & Sameni Keyvani, F. (2011). Conceptual approach to e-government, targets and barriers facing it. In: 5th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2011.6110903

Kupka, V. (2008) Alternative Ways of Election in the 21st Century. The Way Towards Direct Democracy? Slovak Journal of Political Science, 8(4), 111–138.

Lidinský, V. (2008). eGovernment bezpečně [eGovernment the Safe Way]. Grada.

Mettler, T. (2019). The Road to Digital and Smart Government in Switzerland. In A. Ladner, N. Soguel, Y. Emery, S. Weerts, & S. Nahrath (Eds.), Swiss Public Administration: Making the State Work Successfully (175–186). Palgrave Macmillan.

Ministry of the Interior. (2017). Strategický rámec rozvoje [Strategic framework for development]. Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky. https://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/archiv-implementacni-plany.aspx

Office of the Government of the Czech Republic. (2017). Historie minulých vlád. [History of past governments.] Government of the Czech Republic. https://www.vlada.cz/cz/clenove-vlady/historie-minulych-vlad/statni-informacni-politika---cesta-k-informacni-spolecnosti---dokument-2089/.

Office of the Slovak Government. (2010). Programové vyhlásenie vlády Slovenskej republiky na obdobie rokov 2010 – 2014. [Program Announcement of the Government of the Slovak Republic for the Period 2010 - 2014.] Občianska zodpovednosť a spolupráca [Civic responsibility and cooperation]. https://www.vlada.gov.sk/programove-vyhlasenie-vlady-sr-na-obdobie-rokov-2010-2014/

Špaček, D. (2012). eGovernment: cíle, trendy a přístupy k jeho hodnocení [eGovernment: objectives, trends, and approaches to evaluation]. C. H. Beck.

Wavestone. (2020). Digital public administration fact sheets 2020 Switzerland. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/inline-files/Digital_Public_Admin_Factsheets_Switzerland_vFINAL.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-01-20

How to Cite

Lukáč, M., & Ganobčík, J. (2022). Influence of public policy actors on the development of eGovernment in the Slovak Republic and other European countries. Political Preferences, (29), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.31261/polpre.2021.29.77-97