Nash – Disequilibrium, Random Decisions and Imbalance of Society: Is it Relevant to Ukraine?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/polpre.2023.1.5-30

Keywords:

Ukrainian society, case study, mathematical modeling, Nash disequilibrium, Axelrod tournament

Abstract

Ukrainian society is undergoing rapid transformational changes. The authors attempted to identify the main behavioral strategies before the war as well as possible changes in the following years. Attempting to recognize the most prevalent behavior in society, the interaction and attitude of students during the exam were taken into consideration. The student group includes representatives of various regions in proportionate numbers. The research is based on the simulation of the interaction of different groups in society by means of game theory and programming. The study proposes using Schumpeter market disturbances and ‘Nash disequilibrium’ to invigorate the current ineffective system. It has been shown that pre-war Ukrainian society exhibited a very high level of collusion. The interim conclusions were tested using Axelrod’s tournament algorithms and strategies. A simulation of the cooperative equilibrium in Ukrainian society during the pre-war period was demonstrated. The study also contains important predictions about the changes in the institutional environment in the aftermath of the war in Ukraine.

References

Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, New Series, 211(4489), 1390–1396.

Axelrod, R. (1980). Effective Choice in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24, 3–25.

Axelrod Python library. (2015). Strategies index.

https://axelrod.readthedocs.io/en/fix-documentation/reference/all_strategies.html

Bilotkach, V., (2006). A Tax Evasion - Bribery Game: Experimental Evidence from Ukraine. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 3(1), 31–49.

Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D.R. (2017). Macroeconomics, 7th ed. Pearson.

Boudon, R. (1982). The Unintended Consequences of Social Action. St. Martin’s Press.

Committee of Entrepreneurs of Lviv Oblast. (2006). Lviv entrepreneurs researched the values of the residents of their city. https://kpl.org.ua/news/2007/10/08/447

Dolishniyj, M. I. (2006). Regìonal´na polìtika na rubezhi XX – XXI stolìt: nowi prioroteti (Regional policy in the late 20th-early 21st centuries: New priorities). Naukowa dumka, Kyiv.

Fatima, R. (2017). Role of Mathematics in the Development of Society.

https://www.academia.edu/36805946/Role_of_Mathematics_in_the_Development_of_Society.

Friedman, J.W. (1990). Game theory with applications to economics, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.

Fudenberg, D., & Maskin, E. (1986). The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information, Econometrica, 54(3), 533–554.

Gibbons, R., (1992). Game theory for applied economists. Princeton University Press.

Gillies, R.M., Ashman, A.F., & Terwel, J. (2008). The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom. New York.

Hurnyak, I., & Kordonska, A. (2019). Analysis of Institutions Interaction in Ukrainian Economy by Using Game Theory Models, Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 10(1), 139–151.

Hurtado, C. (2015). A Version of the Folk Theorem, UIUC-Economics.

Karhina, K., Ghazinour, M., Ng N., & Eriksson, M. (2017). Social Capital Transformation, Voluntarily Services and Mental Healthduring Times of Military Conflict in Ukraine. Global Journal of Health Science, 9(5), DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v9n5p141

Klicperová, M., Feierabend, I.K., & Hofstetter, C.R. (1997). In the search of a post-totalitarian syndrome: A theoretical framework and empirical assessment. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 7(1), 39–52.

Lee, Ch., & Lee, Ch.-H., (2023). The Effect of Defection in Maximizing Group Benefit. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1), DOI: 10.1080/08839514.2022.2157594

Murthy, R. S., & Lakshminarayana, R. (2006). Mental health consequences of war: a brief review of research findings. World Psychiatry, 5(1), 25–30.

Osiichuk, M., Shepotylo, O. (2020). Conflict and well-being of civilians: The case of the Russian-Ukrainian hybrid war. Economic Systems, 44(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2019.100736.

Semigina, T. (2019). Frustrations or moving forward? Ukrainian social work within the ‘hybrid war’ context. European Journal of Social Work, 22(3), 446–457. DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2017.1366432

Shevlin, M., Hyland, P., & Karatzias, T. (2022). The psychological consequences of the Ukraine war: What we know, and what we have to learn. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 146(2), 105-106, DOI: 10.1111/acps.13466

Stadnik, A. V., Melnyk, Yu. B., Babak, S. A., Vashchenko I. V., & Krut, P. P. (2022). Psychological Distress among Students and Cadets of Universities in the War Conditions. International Journal of Science Annals, 5(1-2), 20–29. DOI: 10.26697/ijsa.2022.1-2.0

Steuart, G., (1993). Social and Behavioral Change Strategies. Health Education Quarterly, 20(1), 113-135. DOI:10.1177/10901981930200S110

Stiglitz, J.E. (1998). Towards a new paradigm for development: strategies, policies, and processes. Prebisch Lecture at UNCTAD, UNCTAD.

Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics, 1st ed. W.W. Norton & Company.

Varian, H. R. (2010). Intermediate microeconomics: a modern approach, 8th ed. W.W. Norton & Co.

Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421-445.

World Bank. (2022, May 18). Education: Impact of the War in Ukraine.

https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/education-impact-war-ukraine-may-2022

Zafirovski, M. (2003). Human Rational Behavior and Economic Rationality. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7(2), 1-34, https://sociology.lightningpath.org/ejs-archives/vol7.2/02_zafirovski.html

Downloads

Published

2023-08-17

How to Cite

Hurnyak, I., Struk, O., & Hrytsyshyn, A. (2023). Nash – Disequilibrium, Random Decisions and Imbalance of Society: Is it Relevant to Ukraine?. Political Preferences, 31(1-2), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.31261/polpre.2023.1.5-30