Do humanists share responsibility for the climate crisis?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/PS_P.2023.31.04

Keywords:

climate crisis, humanities discourse, pro-climate education

Abstract

The aim of this article is to critically consider the question of whether the humanities share responsibility for the climate crisis by virtue of the dominant modes by which it is practised. As it seems, the dominant discursive practices of contemporary humanities – cognitive, communicative, textual – which have grown out of the Western model of thinking, are at odds with pro-climate demands. The tendency towards separating areas of research, towards categorisation and narrow specialisation, as well as the logic of growth and the institutional structure of science are not conducive to the development of interdependence, relationality, responsibility, forward thinking, among other things, i.e. the attitudes and postulates that are essential in acting for the good of the climate. In addition, the symbolic culture of writing, which is based on mediation, distance and high communicative competence, is also not conducive to the implementation of these postulates, and is even in conflict with them. The discursive practices based on these principles are worth changing. We should make wider use of other forms of communication and cognitive models and focus on practising interdependence and action for climate in collaboration with other areas of science.

Author Biography

Maciej Michalski, University of Gdansk

MACIEJ MICHALSKI – associate professor, Institute of Polish Philology, Department
of Literary Theory and Art Criticism, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Polska. The author is engaged in the study of the relationship between literature and philosophy, the discourse of the humanities, and the problems of contemporary literary education. He has published, among others, Filozof jako pisarz. Kołakowski – Skarga – Tischner [The Philosopher as Writer. Kołakowski – Skarga – Tischner] (Gdańsk 2010), Polonistyka końca świata. Edukacja literacka wobec wyzwań współczesności [Polish Studies of the End of the World. Literary Education Facing the Challenges of Modernity] (Gdańsk–Sopot 2022).

References

Collins H., 2018, Czy wszyscy jesteśmy ekspertami?, przeł. E. Bińczyk, J. Grygieńć, PWN, Warszawa.

Dukaj J., 2019, Po piśmie, Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków.

Duszak A., 1998, Tekst, dyskurs, komunikacja międzykulturowa, PWN, Warszawa.

Furedi F., 2015, Power of Reading: From Socrates to Twitter, Bloomsbury Publishing, London.

Kahneman D., 2012, Pułapki myślenia. O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym, przeł. P. Szymczak, Media Rodzina, Poznań.

Korwin-Piotrowska D., 2020, Eutoryka. Rzecz o dobrej (roz)mowie, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.

Markowski M.P., 2019, Wojny nowoczesnych plemion, Karakter, Kraków.

Mbembe A., 2015, Decolonizing Knowledge and the Question of the Archive, https://wiser.wits.ac.za/sites/default/files/private/Achille%20Mbembe%20-%20Decolonizing%20Knowledge%20and%20the%20Question%20of%20the%20Archive.pdf [dostęp: 14.05.2022].

Nisbett R.E., 2015, Geografia myślenia, przeł. E. Wojtych, Wydawnictwo Smak Słowa, Sopot.

Schwarz B., 2013, Paradoks wyboru. Dlaczego więcej oznacza mniej, przeł. M. Walczyński, PWN, Warszawa.

Taleb N.N., 2020, Antykruchość. Jak żyć w świecie, którego nie rozumiemy, przeł. O. Siara, Rebis, Poznań.

Verlie B., 2022, Learning to Live with Climate Change: From Anxiety to Transformation, Routledge, Abingdon.

Welzer H., 2014, Climate Wars: What People Will Be Killed For in the 21th Century – A Lecture by Harald Welzer, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZyrGdNvAvw&t=5961s [dostęp: 14.12.2022].

Welzer H., 2016, Samodzielne myślenie, przeł. V. Grotowicz, Wydawnictwo Dobra Literatura, Słupsk.

Published

2023-06-15

How to Cite

Michalski, M. (2023). Do humanists share responsibility for the climate crisis?. Postscriptum Polonistyczne, 31(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31261/PS_P.2023.31.04