Pandemic Automobility. Patterns of Crisis and Opportunity in the American Motor Culture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/rias.11810

Keywords:

automobility, Covid-19, trauma, risk, medicalization

Abstract

This article traces the recursive character of automobility from a perspective of cultural crises and traumas that accompany motor culture development in the USA. The American automobility system has been caught in the treadmill of ideological criticism that defined the current role of motor vehicles in forms of political activism and cultural criticism. The ongoing Covid-19 pandemic is different as it seems to bring restoration to the original character of motor culture with its defining features of individualism, freedom, and opportunity achieved through mobility.

Author Biography

Tomasz Burzyński, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

Tomasz Burzyński received his PhD in 2009 from the University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland. He works at the Institute of Literary Studies where he teaches Sociology, Media Studies, and Cultural Studies. His research interests include cultural studies and cultural theory, sociology of risk, theories of trust, and discourses of health and illness. Recent publications: “Sociologizing Automotive Heritage. Traditions of Automobile Folklore and the Challenges of Risk Society,” in: The Routledge Companion to Automobile Heritage, Culture, and Preservation, red. J. Clark, B. Stiefel. (New York and London: Routledge: 2020); “Systemic Intertextuality. A Morphogenetic Perspective,” Text Matters. A Journal of Literature Theory and Culture 10 (2020).

References

Beckmann, Jörg. “Mobility and Safety.” Automobilities, edited by M. Featherstone, N. Thrift, J. Urry. Sage Publications, 2005, pp. 81–100.

Berger, Michael. The Automobile in American History and Culture. Greenwood Press, 2001.

Burzyński, Tomasz. “Sociologizing Automotive Heritage. Traditions of Automobile Folklore and the Challenges of Risk Society.” The Routledge Companion to Automobile Heritage, Culture, and Preservation, edited by J. Clark, B. Stiefel. Routledge, 2020, pp. 205–214.

Conrad, Peter. The Medicalization of Society. On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Treatable Disorders. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007.

Davidson, Joyce and Miligan, Christine. “Embodying Emotion Sensing Space: Introducing Emotional Geographies.” Social & Cultural Geography, vol. 5, no. 4, 2004, pp. 523–532.

Douglas, Mary and Wildavsky, Aaron. Risk and Culture. An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, 1982.

Dunn, James A. “The Politics of Automobility.” The Brookings Review, vol. 17, no. 1, 1999, pp. 40–43.

Furedi, Frank. The Culture of Fear Revisited. Continuum, 2006.

Gartman, David. “Three Ages of the Automobile. The Cultural Logics of the Car.” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 21, no. 4/5, 2004, pp. 169–195.

Giddens, Anthony. Modernity and Self-Identity. The Self and Society in Late Modern Age. University of California Press, 1991.

Marx, Leo. “Technology. The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept.” Social Research, 64, no. 3, Fall 1997, pp. 965–988.

Omran, Abdel R. “The Epidemiological Transition. A Theory of the Epidemiology of Population Change.” The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 1, 1971, pp. 509–538.

Phelan, Mark. “Buyers’ interest in owning cars rises after coronavirus, survey finds.” Detroit Free Press. https://eu.freep.com/story/money/cars/mark-phelan/2020/05/02/buyers-interest-owning-cars-increased-coronavirus-survey-finds/3060175001/. Accessed 31 Mar. 2021.

Postman, Neil. Technopoly. The Surrender of Culture to Technology. Vintage Books, 1993.

Sheller, Mimi. “Automotive emotions. Feeling the car.” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 21, no. 4/5, 2004, pp. 221–242.

Smith, Ashley. “New research finds drive-through mass-vaccination clinics could alter COVID-19 trajectory.” Research News. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2021-02/ifor-nrf021721.php. Accessed 9 Apr. 2021.

Sztompka, Piotr. “The Trauma of Social Change. A Case of Postcommunist Societies.” Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, edited by. J.C. Alexander et. al. University of California Press, 2004, pp. 155–195.

Turner, B. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Sage, 1996.

Urry, John. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 21, 2004, pp. 25–39.

Urry, John. “Inhabiting the Car.” The Editorial Board of Sociological Review. Blackwell Publishers, 2006, pp. 17–31.

Ward, Paul R. “A sociology of the Covid-19 pandemic: A commentary and research agenda for sociologists.” Journal of Sociology, vol. 56, no. 4, 2020, pp. 726–735.

Car Culture(s): Machines, Roads, Mythologies

Downloads

Published

2021-12-19

How to Cite

Burzyński, T. (2021). Pandemic Automobility. Patterns of Crisis and Opportunity in the American Motor Culture. Review of International American Studies, 14(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.31261/rias.11810

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2021): Car Culture(s): Machines, Roads, Mythologies—RIAS Vol. 14, Fall–Winter (2/2021)

Section

FEATURES

License

The Copyright Holder of the submitted text is the Author. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the RIAS websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Any commercial use requires separate written agreement with the Author and a proper credit line indicating the source of the original publication in RIAS.

  1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY 4.0 license.

  1. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution - By the same conditions 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

  1. User Rights

Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

  1. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.