Gaze. An In/Sight
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/rias.12505Keywords:
International American Studies Association, Surveillance, liberty, genderAbstract
Desired and abhorred, wished for and fought against, protective and oppressive, surveillance is older than the hills. Since the times immemorial, humans would pray to all-seeing gods in hope that the immortals would watch over them and protect them against perils. Divine protection, however, has always come at a price. Irrespective of the religion, the promise of the deliverance from (variously construed) evil hinges upon the believer’s readiness to dutifully observe gods-given laws. Defiance, impossible to hide from the all-seeing eye, does not only strip one of the “protected” status—it also dooms one to (inevitable) punishment. Why then would anyone choose to transgress? Why not entrust oneself to surveillance if there is nothing sinister to hide? What could be wrong about abiding by the laws? Revisiting some of the essential notions of surveillance studies, this editorial proposes a shift from the concepts explored by Jeremy Bentham and Michel Foucault to Deleuzoguattarian, post-humanist, perspective on surveillance studies.
References
Benjamin, Ruha. “Introduction: Discriminatory Design, Liberating Imagination,” Captivating Technology: Race, Carceral Techoscience, and Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life. Duke University Press, 2019.
Brunon-Ernst, Anne. Beyond Foucault. New Perspectives on Bentham’s Panopticon. Routledge, 2016.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Penguin, 1991.
Galič, Maša, Tjerk Timan & Bert-Jaap Koops, “Bentham, Deleuze and Beyond: An Overview of Surveillance Theories from the Panopticon to Participation,” Philosophy & Technology, vol. 30, issue 9–37, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0219-1
Gorliński-Kucik, Piotr. “On Liberatory Strategies of Digital Nomads,” Er(r)go. Theory–Literature–Culture, no. 42 (2/2021), pp. 87–110. https://doi.org/10.31261/errgo.9155
Mayes, Christopher R. “Revisiting Foucault’s ‘Normative Confusions’: Surveying the Debate Since the Collège de France Lectures,” Philosophy Compass, vol. 10, issue 12, 2015, pp. 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12274
Stetson Gilliam, Charlotte. “The Yellow Wallpaper,” https://www.nlm.nih.gov/exhibition/theliteratureofprescription/exhibitionAssets/digitalDocs/The-Yellow-Wall-Paper.pdf, pp. 649–650. Accessed 10 Apr. 2022.
Szatanik, Zuzanna. De-Shamed. Feminist Strategies of Transgression. The Case of Lorna Crozier’s Poetry. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego 2011. https://www.sbc.org.pl/dlibra/publication/388165/edition/365847/content
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Holder of the submitted text is the Author. The Reader is granted the rights to use the material available in the RIAS websites and pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative CommonsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0). Any commercial use requires separate written agreement with the Author and a proper credit line indicating the source of the original publication in RIAS.
- License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY 4.0 license.
- Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution - By the same conditions 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
- User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
- Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
