World Literature and International American Studies: Convergence, Divergence, and Contest

Authors

  • Paul Giles Department of English US Studies Centre's International Academic Advisory Committee University of Sidney

Keywords:

World Literature, Comparative Literature, International American Studies, Globalization

Abstract

Paul Giles
Department of English
US Studies Centre's International Academic Advisory Committee
University of Sidney

World Literature and International American Studies: Convergence, Divergence, and Contest

Abstract: This paper considers the relation between the institutional formations of World Literature and International American Studies. It compares and contrasts the association between World Literature and Comparative Literature to that between International American Studies and the American Studies movement emerging out of the United States. It goes on to argue that World Literature is anchored to a universalist teleology, one linked historically to an idealist intellectual genealogy. By contrast, International American Studies involves a more materialist, multidirectional emphasis that differentiates it from the U.S. appropriation of globalization to further its own strategic interests.

Keywords: World Literature, Comparative Literature, International American Studies, Globalization

Author Biography

Paul Giles, Department of English US Studies Centre's International Academic Advisory Committee University of Sidney

Paul Giles is Challis Chair of English at the University of Sydney, Australia. He was president of the International American Studies Association between 2005 and 2007. His most recent books are Antipodean America: Australasia and the Constitution of U.S. Literature (Oxford UP, 2014); The Global Remapping of American Literature (Princeton UP, 2011); Transnationalism in Practice: Essays on American Studies, Literature, and Religion (Edinburgh UP, 2010).

References

Apter, Emily. Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability. Verso, 2013.

Bharati Mukerjee, Jasmine. Virago, 1991.

Cheah, Pheng. What Is a World?: On Postcolonial Literature as World Literature. Duke UP, 2016.

Damrosch, David. What Is World Literature? Princeton UP, 2003.

Eco, Umberto. “From Marco Polo to Leibniz: Stories of Intercultural Misunderstandings,” in Serendipities: Language and Lunacy. Harcourt, 1998.

Giles, Paul “Globalization,” in American Literature in Transition: The 1990s, edited by Stephen Burn, Cambridge UP, forthcoming.

Harvey, David. The New Imperialism. Oxford UP, 2003.

Harootunian, Harry. Overcome by Modernity: History, Culture, and Community in Interwar Japan. Princeton UP, 2000.

Johar Schueller, Malini, and Edward Watts, “Introduction: Theorizing Early American Studies and Postcoloniality,” in Messy Beginnings: Postcoloniality and Early American Studies, edited by Schueller and Watts, Rutgers UP, 2003.

Kuan-Hsing, Chen. Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization. Duke UP, 2010.

Lowe, Lisa. The Intimacy of Four Continents. Duke UP, 2015.

Lyons, Paul, and Ty P. Kāwika Tengan. “Introduction: Pacific Currents,” American Quarterly 67.3 (Sept. 2015), pp. 545-74.

Mitchell, David. The Bone Clocks. Random House, 2014.

Moretti, Franco. “Conjectures on World Literature,” New Left Review, NS 1 (Jan.-Feb. 2000).

Rosendahl Thomsen, Mads. Mapping World Literature: International Canonization and Transnational Literatures. Continuum, 2008.

Žižek, Slavoj. “Multiculturalism, or the Cultural Logic of Multinational Capitalism,” New Left Review 1/225 (Sept.-Oct. 1997).

Published

2017-06-30

How to Cite

Giles, P. (2017). World Literature and International American Studies: Convergence, Divergence, and Contest. Review of International American Studies, 10(1). Retrieved from https://trrest.vot.pl/ojsus/index.php/RIAS/article/view/5402