Posthumanity and the Prison-House of Gender in Douglas Coupland’s <i>Microserfs</i>

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/rias.7621

Keywords:

Douglas Coupland, Microserfs, posthuman, cyborg theory, gender

Abstract

This article aims to analyze Douglas Coupland’s Microserfs with a deliberate emphasis on posthuman theory, body politics, and gender to construe the transformation of the human body, human-machine nexus, and captivity in inhumanity with a struggle to (re)humanize minds and their bodies. One of the arguments of the paper will be that posthumanism offers a new outlet for breaking the chains of captivity, that is, escaping into non-human to redefine humanity and to emancipate the human mind and human body to notch up a more liberated and more equitable definition of humanity. As gender and sex are further marked by the mechanical and mass-mediated reproduction of human experiences, history, and memory, space and time, postmodern gender theories present a perpetual in-betweenness, transgression and fluidity and the dissolution of grand narratives also resulted in a dissolution of the heteronormative and essentialist uniformity and solidity of the human body. Gender in a posthuman context is characterized by a parallel tendency for reclaiming the possession of the body and sexual identity with a desire to transform the body as a physical entity through plastic surgery, genetic cloning, in vitro fertilization, and computerization of human mind and memory. Therefore, the human body has lost its quality as gendered and sexed and has been imprisoned in an embodiment of infantile innocence and manipulability, a “ghost in the machine,” or a cyborg, a hybrid of machine and organism (Haraway). The human-machine symbiosis, then, is exteriorized and extended into a network of objects switching “natural human body” to an immaterialized, dehumanized, and prosthetic “data made flesh.” In this regard, Coupland’s Microserfs boldly explores the potential of posthuman culture to provide a deconstruction of human subjectivity through an analysis of human and machine interaction and to demonstrate how human beings transgress the captivity of humanity by technologizing their bodies and minds in an attempt to become more human than human.

Author Biography

Murat Göç-Bilgin, Celal Bayar University

Murat Göç is an assistant professor of English Language and Literature at Celal Bayar University Turkey. He received his PhD degree from Ege University American Culture and Literature Department. His main fields of interest are: contemporary American literature, literary theory, gender studies, and, in particular, masculinity studies. He is the founding editor of the Masculinities Journal and a member of the Initiative for Critical Studies of Masculinities, an academic network of scholars based in Turkey, working on establishing and ensuring gender equality, supporting LGBTI rights, and inspiring a critical transformation of masculinities.

References

Baudrillard, Jean. The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. Sage Publications Ltd, 1998.

Baudrillard, Jean. Screened Out, Translated by Chris Turner, Verso, 2002.

Bordo, Susan. “From Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body.” Norton

Anthology of Theory and Criticism, edited by Vincent. B. Leitch. W.W. Norton Company, 2001, pp. 2362-2376.

Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge, 1990.

Coupland, Douglas. Microserfs. Harper Perennial, 2008.

Fitting, Peter. "The Lessons of Cyberpunk." Technoculture, edited by Constance Penley and Andrew Ross. Cultural Politics 3. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1991, pp. 295-315.

Halberstam, Judith and Ira Livingstone. “Introduction.” Posthuman Bodies, edited by Judith Halberstam and Ira Livingstone. Indiana UP, 1995.

Haney, William S. Cyberculture, Cyborgs and Science Fiction: Consciousness and the Posthuman. New York: Rodopi, 2006.

Haraway, Donna. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.” Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, edited by Vincent. B. Leitch. W.W. Norton Company, 2001. pp. 2269-2299.

Hayles, N. K. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. U of Chicago P, 1999.

Kroker, Arthur. Body Drift. U of Minnesota P, 2012.

Levin, Charles. “Carnal Knowledge of Aesthetic States: The Infantile Body, The Sign, and The Postmortemist Condition.” Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, vol. 11, no 1-2, 1987, pp. 90-110.

Miller, D. Q. “Deeper Blues, or the Posthuman Prometheus: Cybernetic Renewal and the Late-Twentieth-Century American Novel.” American Literature, vol. 77, no 2, 2005, pp. 379-407. 10.1215/00029831-77-2-379.

Nayar, Pramod. Posthumanism. Polity, 2013.

Rutsky, R.L. High Techne. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1999.

Tate, Andrew. Contemporary American and Canadian Writers: Douglas Coupland. Manchester UP, 2007.

Silvio, Carl. “Refiguring the Radical Cyborg in Mamoru Oshii's ‘Ghost in the Shell.’" Science Fiction Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, March 1999, pp. 54-72

Wolfe, Cary. What is Posthumanism. U of Minnesota P, 2009.

Published

2020-08-16

How to Cite

Göç-Bilgin, M. (2020). Posthumanity and the Prison-House of Gender in Douglas Coupland’s <i>Microserfs</i>. Review of International American Studies, 13(1), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.31261/rias.7621