The Problem of the Size of Municipalities in Slovenia: Views of Residents and Mayors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/spus.17482Keywords:
local self-government, municipality, mayors, citizens, size, SloveniaAbstract
The paper analyses the territorial aspects of Slovenian municipalities and the problem of their optimal size. The central question of it, namely, what the ideal or optimal size of municipalities should be in terms of population and surface area, so that they can effectively perform their tasks and at the same time ensure adequate participation of citizens, is a difficult one in political science and has no clear answer. As many other European countries, Slovenia has been facing difficulties since the dawn of its independence (1991) in finding the ideal or optimal size of municipalities and the corresponding scope of their competences. Political arguments often prevail over expert ones, which confirms the seriousness of a social problem that goes beyond local self-government and affects the whole country. The search for the ideal size of municipalities – whether by partitioning or merging them – has been a hotly debated issue, dividing both politicians and
the professional community, yet according to the results of the analysis carried out, Slovenia may not be as far from the ideal size of municipalities as these debates sometimes make it seem.
References
Aristotle (1948). Politics (translated by Sir Ernest Barker). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baldersheim, H., & Rose, L. E. (2010). Territorial Choice: Rescaling Governance in European States. In H. Baldersheim & L. E. Rose (eds.), Territorial Choice: The Politics of Boundaries and Borders (pp. 1–20). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Belley, S. (2012). Amalgamation (or Merger). In L. Côté & J.-F. Savard (eds.), Encyclopaedic Dictionary of Public Administration. ENAP: Paris.
Boyne, G. A. (1992). Local Government Structure and Performance: Lessons from America? Public Administration, 70, 333–357.
Boyne, G. A. (1996). Scale, Performance and the New Public Management: An Empirical Analysis of Local Authority Services. Journal of Management Studies, 33(69), 809–826.
Brezovšek, M. (2005). Velikost in nalog občin v Sloveniji [Size and competencies of Slovenian municipalities]. In M. Brezovšek & M. Haček (eds.), Lokalna demokracija II. Uresničevanje lokalne samouprave v Sloveniji [Local democracy II. The implementation of local self-government in Slovenia] (pp. 68–85). Ljubljana: FSS Publishing House.
Brezovšek, M. (2009). Territorial organisation of local self-government and the size of municipalities: Slovenia in comparison with CEE. In M. Haček (ed.), Lokalna demokracija III: Ob petnajsti oblettici ponovne uvedbe lokalne samouprave v Republiki Sloveniji [Local democracy III: Fifteenth anniversary of local self-government in Slovenia] (pp. 197–216). Ljubljana: FSS Publishing House.
Brezovšek, M., & Kukovič, S. (2012). Organizacija lokalne oblasti v Sloveniji [Organisation of Local Government in Slovenia]. Ljubljana: FSS Publishing House.
Brezovšek, M., & Kukovič, S. (2015). European Public Administration. Ljubljana: FSS Publishing House.
CDLR (Steering Committee on Local and Regional Democracy). (2001) Relationship between the size of local and regional authorities and their effectiveness and economy of their action. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Čokert, A. (2005). Territorial part of the local self-government reform in Slovenia. Dela, 24, 207–217.
Dahl, R. A. (1967). The City in the Future of Democracy. American Political Science Review, 61(4), 953–970.
Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and Democracy. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Denters, B., Goldsmith, M., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., & Rose, L. E. (2014). Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Dollery, B., Crase, E. L., & Johnson, A. (2006). Australian Local Government Economics. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Dollery, B., Mun Ho, C., & Alin, J. (2008). No Lessons Learned: A Crotique of the Queensland Local Government Reform Commission Final Report. Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 15(1), 67–84.
Dollery, B. E., & Robboti, L. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Local Government Reform. London: Edgar Publishing Limited.
Feiock, R. C. (2007). Rational Choice and Regional Governance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 47–63.
Grafenauer, B. (2000). Local Government in Slovenia – Territorial Organisational Structures. Maribor: Faculty of Law.
Haček, M. (2012). Slovenia, a country of small and weak municipalities? [Slovenia, country of small and weak municipalities?]. In I. Bačlija (ed.), Lokalna demokracija IV: aktualni problemi lokalne samouprave [Local democracy IV: current problems of self-government] (pp. 65–82). Maribor: Lex Localis.
Humes, S., & Harloff, E. The structure of local government: A comparative survey of 81 countries. Hague: International Union of Local Authorities.
Keating, M. (1995). Size, Efficiency and democracy: Consolidation. Fragmentation and Public Choice. In D. Judge, G. Stoker & H. Wolman (eds.), Theories of Urban Politics (pp. 117–134). London and New Delhi: Thousand Oaks/Sage.
King, D. S. (1984). Fiscal Tiers: The economy of multi-level government. London: Allen & Unwin.
Kristinsson, G. H. (2014). Hin mörgu andlit lýðræðis: Þátttaka og vald á sveitarstjórnarstiginu. Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan.
Kuhlmann, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2016). Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2014). Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Kukovič, S. (2015). Local political leadership: Slovenian mayors in comparative perspective. Ljubljana: FSS Publishing House.
Kukovič, S. (2018). Coping with demographic challenges: case of Slovenian local communities. Journal of Comparative Politics, 11(2), 83–100.
Kukovič, S., Haček, M., & Bukovnik, A. (2016). The issue of local autonomy in Slovenian Local Government System. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 14(3), 303–330.
Lassen, D. D., & Serritzlew, S. (2011). Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-scale Municipal Reform. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 238–258.
Law on Local Government. (1993). Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia. Available at https://www.uradni-list.si/glasilo-uradni-list-rs/vsebina/2007-01-4692?sop=2007-01-4692.
Navarro, C. J., & Clark, T. N. (2010). Contextualizing political participation, territorial and institutional effects. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociologicas.
Newton, K. (1982). Is small really so beautiful? Is big really so ugly? Size, efficiency, and democracy in local government. Political studies, 30 (June), 190–206.
Sancton, A., James, R., & Ramsay, R. (2000). Amalgamation Vs. Inter-Municipal cooperation: Financing Local and Infrastructure Services. Toronto: Intergovernmental Committee on Urban and Regional Research.
Swianiewicz, P. (2000). In search of optimal size. Options of East-Central European mayors on merging/splitting their municipalities. Paper at IPSA conference, Quebec, Canada, 1–5 August 2000.
Swianiewicz, P. (2002a). Size of Local Government, Local democracy and efficiency in Delivery of Local Services. International Context and Theoretical Framework. In P. Swianiewicz (ed.), Consolidation or Fragmentation? The Size of local government in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 1–30). Budapest: Open Society Institute.
Swianiewicz, P. (2002b). Consolidation or fragmentation: The size of local governments in central and eastern Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute.
Swianiewicz, P. (2002c). Is There a Third Way Between Small yet Ineffective and Big yet Less Democratic? Comparative Conclusions and Lessons Learned. In P. Swianiewicz (ed.), Consolidation or Fragmentation? The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 293–326). Budapest: Open Society Institute.
Tavares, A. F. (2018). Municipal Amalgamations and Their Effects: A Literature Review. Miscellanea Geographica, 22(1), 5–15.
Vlaj, S. (2004). Local government: theory and praxis. Ljubljana: FSS Publishing House.
Vrišer, I. (1994). Ozemeljsko oblikovanje občin [Territorial design of municipalities]. Ljubljana: Governmental Office for the Reform of Local Government.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
