From Critique to Post-Critique. New Possibilities for Social Interventions of Literature in Rita Felski’s The Limits of Critique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/SSP.2022.20.06Keywords:
critique, post-critique, Rita Felski, hermeneutics of suspicion, actornetwork theoryAbstract
The article discusses a groundbreaking post-critical project in Anglo-Saxon literary studies formulated in Rita Felski’s book The Limits of Critique. Tomasz Mizerkiewicz offers a comprehensive analysis of the “hermeneutics of suspicion” carried out by Felski, showing its numerous limitations. Felski argues that criticism – understood as an emotionally uninvolved reading of literature being part of the panoptic system of power that subjugates individuals – should be modified to embrace an affective quality and a new vision of the ontology of a literary work. Felski believes that thanks to Bruno Latour’s actor-network theory, it is possible to begin to perceive the literary work as a causative non-human actor. The work then avoids participating in the sterile dispute between the idea of the autonomy of art and radical pragmatism, which assumes the full dependence of the meanings of this work on the context. Theorized in new phenomenological analyses, literature demonstrates a capacity to exert influence. At the same time, it does not do anything by itself, but in cooperation with other important human and non-human actors (readers, schools, reading family customs and others). The type of critique described in The Limits of Critique becomes a conscious participant in the social interventions of literature consisting in the joint discovery of the possibility of the emergence of new types of connections, networks and communities. Thus, critique and literature contribute to the development of particularly effective varieties of aesthetic, economic and political agency.
References
Anker Elisabeth S., Felski Rita, eds., 2017: Critique and Postcritique. Duke University Press, Durham–London.
Beckwith Sarah, 2017: Reading for Our Lives. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 331–336. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.331.
Best Stephen, 2017: „La foi postcritique”, on Second Thought. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.337.
Branch Lori, 2016: Postcritical and Postsecular: The Horizon of Belief. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 160–167. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377486 [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Eagleton Terry, 2017: Not Just Anybody. [Rev. Rita Felski: The Limits of Critique]. „London Review of Books”, vol. 39, no. 1. https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v39/n01/terry-eagleton/not-just-anybody [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Felski Rita, 1995: Gender of Modernity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.–London.
Felski Rita, 2000: Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture. New York University Press, New York–London.
Felski Rita, 2003: Literature after Feminism. Chicago University Press, Chicago–London.
Felski Rita, 2008: Uses of Literature. Blackwell Publishing, Malden–Oxford.
Felski Rita, 2015: Limits of Critique. Chicago University Press, Chicago–London.
Felski Rita, 2016: Literatura w użyciu. Przeł. Joanna Borkowska et al. Wydawnictwo „Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne”, Poznań.
Felski Rita, 2017a: Kontekst jest do bani. Przeł. Krzysztof Hoffmann, Weronika Szwebs. „Forum Poetyki”, nr 7 (wiosna/lato), s. 94–111.
Felski Rita, 2017b: Response. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.384.
Felski Rita, 2020: Hooked. Art and Attachment. Chicago University Press, Chicago–London.
Fessenden Tracy, 2016: A Hermeneutics of Resilience and Repair. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 167–172. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377487 [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Friedman Susan Stanford, 2017: Both/And: Critique and Discovery in Humanities. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.344.
Fuss Diana, 2017: But What about Love? PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 352–355. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.352.
Giusti Francesco, 2019: Passionate Affinities: A Conversation with Rita Felski. „Los Angeles Review of Books”, September 25. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/passionate-affinities-a-conversationwith-rita-felski/ [dostęp: 3.04.2022].
Gustafson Sandra M., Gardner Tyler, 2016: Introduction: Possibilities Beyond Critique. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 156–159. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377485 [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Jacobs Alan, 2016: Vulnerabilities and Rewards. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 173–179. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377488 [dostęp: 4.10.2022].
Jagoda Patrick, 2017: Critique and Critical Making. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.356.
Kurnick David, 2020: A Few Lies: Queer Theory and Our Method Melodramas. „English Literary History”, vol. 87 (2), s. 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.2020.0011.
Love Heather, 2017: „Critique Is Ordinary”. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.364.
McDermott Ryan, 2016: Conversion and Critique. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 179–183. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377489 [dostęp: 5.10.2022].
Mullins Matthew, 2015: Are We Postcritical? „Los Angeles Review of Books”, December 25. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/are-wepostcritical/ [dostęp: 3.04.2022].
Pecora Vincent P., 2016: „Suspicion… Hermeneutics… Religion?”. „Religion & Literature”, vol. 48, no. 2, s. 183–189. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26377490 [dostęp: 5.10.2022].
Robbins Bruce, 2017: Not So Well Attached. PMLA, vol. 132, issue 2, s. 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.371.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.