Ratings of Affective and Non-Affective Aspects of German Idioms in Second Language Processing

Teodor Petrič

doi:10.31261/TAPSLA.2019.05.02

Published: 2019-06-30

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019)

Ratings of Affective and Non-Affective Aspects of German Idioms in Second Language Processing

Teodor Petrič

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.2019.05.02

Abstract

In this paper psycholinguistic and emotional properties of 619 German idiomatic expressions are explored. The list of idiomatic expressions has been adapted from Citron et al. (2015), who have used it with German native speakers. In our study the same idioms were evaluated by Slovene learners of German as a foreign language. Our participants rated each idiom for emotional valence, emotional arousal, familiarity, concreteness, ambiguity (literality), semantic transparency and figurativeness. They also had the task to describe the meaning of the German idioms and to rate their confidence about the attributed meaning. The aims of our study were (1) to provide descriptive norms for psycholinguistic and affective properties of a large set of idioms in German as a second language, (2) to explore the relationships between psycholinguistic and affective properties of idioms in German as a second language, and (3) to compare the ratings of the German native speakers studied in Citron et al. (2015) with the ratings of the Slovene second language learners from our study. On one hand, the results of the Slovene participants show many similarities with those of of the German native speakers, on the other hand, they show a slight positivity bias and slightly shallower emotional processing of the German idioms. Our study provides data that could be useful for future studies investigating the role of affect in figurative language in a second language setting (methodology, translation science, language technology).

Keywords:

SLA , idioms , affective properties , psycholinguistic properties , German , Slovene

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Petrič, T. (2019). Ratings of Affective and Non-Affective Aspects of German Idioms in Second Language Processing. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 5(1), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.31261/TAPSLA.2019.05.02

Cited by / Share

References

Abel, B. (2003). English idioms in the first language and second language lexicon: A dual representation approach. Second Language Research, 19, 329–358.
Google Scholar

Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 967–984.
Google Scholar

Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In Beeman, M.; Chiarello, C., (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (p. 255-284). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Bobrow, S. A., & Bell, S. M. (1973). On catching on to idiomatic expressions. Memory & Cognition, 1, 343–346. doi:10.3758/BF03198118.
Google Scholar

Bohrn, I., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Old proverbs in new skins—an fMRI study on defamiliarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 204. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00204.
Google Scholar

Bond, M. H., & Lai, T. (1986). Embarrassment and code-switching into a second language. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 179–186.
Google Scholar

Bonin, P., Méot, A., & Bugaiska, A. (2013). Norms and comprehension times for 305 French idiomatic expressions. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1259–1271. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0331-4.
Google Scholar

Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: NIMH Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
Google Scholar

Cacciari, C. (1998). Why do we speak metaphorically? Reflections on the functions of metaphor in discourse and reasoning. In Katz, A. N., Cacciari, C., Gibbs, R. W. & Turner, M. (Eds.), Figurative language and thought (pp. 119–158). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Cacciari, C. (2014). Processing multiword idiomatic strings: Many words in one? Mental Lexicon, 9, 267–293.
Google Scholar

Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1994). Understanding figurative language. In Gernsbacher, M. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 447–477). San Diego: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668–683.
Google Scholar

Citron, F. M. M., & Goldberg, A. E. (2014). Metaphorical sentences are more emotionally engaging than their literal counterparts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 2585–2595. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00654.
Google Scholar

Citron, F. M. M., Weekes, B. S., & Ferstl, E. C. (2014). How are affective word ratings related to lexico-semantic properties? Evidence from the Sussex Affective Word List (SAWL). Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 313–331. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000409.
Google Scholar

Citron, F. M. M., Cacciari, C., Kucharski, M., Beck, L., Conrad, M. Jacobs, A. M. (2015): When emotions are expressed figuratively: Psycholinguistic and Affective Norms of 619 Idioms for German (PANIG). Behavior Research Methods, March 2015, 1-22. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0581-4.
Google Scholar

Conrad, M., Recio, G., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). The Time Course of Emotion Effects in First and Second Language Processing: A Cross Cultural ERP Study with German-Spanish Bilinguals. Frontiers in psychology, 2, 351. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00351
Google Scholar

Cronk, B. C., Lima, S. D., & Schweigert, W. A. (1993). Idioms in sentences: Effects of frequency, literalness, and familiarity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 59–82.
Google Scholar

Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1988). Complainable matters: The use of idiomatic expressions in making complaints. Social Problems, 35, 398–417.
Google Scholar

Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27, 495–522.
Google Scholar

Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Google Scholar

Ephras (2006). Ephras. Ein mehrsprachiges phraseologisches Lernmaterial auf CD-ROM. Sokrates Lingua-Projekt 2004-2006, geleitet von Vida Jesenšek. Maribor: Universität Maribor.
Google Scholar

Fainsilber, L., & Ortony, A. (1987). Metaphorical uses of language in the expression of emotions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2, 239–250.
Google Scholar

Fox, J. (2017). Using the R Commander: A Point-and-Click Interface or R. Boca Raton FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
Google Scholar

Gamer, M., Lemon, J., & Singh, I. F. P. (2012). irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement. R package version 0.84, 5 April. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=irr.
Google Scholar

Harris, C. (2004). Bilingual speakers in the lab: psychophysiological measures of emotional reactivity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 223–247.
Google Scholar

Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens. In R. Schrott & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp. 492–520). Munich: Hanser.
Google Scholar

Jacobs, A. M., Võ, M. L.-H., Briesemeister, B. B., Conrad, M., Hofmann, M. J., Kuchinke, L., & Braun, M. (2015). Ten years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: What are the echoes? Manuscript under review at Frontiers in Psychology..
Google Scholar

Jesenšek, V. (Ed.). (2014). Frazeologija nemškega jezika z vidikov kontrastivnega in uporabnega jezikoslovja . Maribor: Filozofska fakulteta Univerze v Mariboru.
Google Scholar

Kline, P. (1999). The Handbook of Psychological Testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2008). The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1103–1121. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1103.
Google Scholar

Ljubešić, N., Fišer, D., & Peti-Stantić, A. (2018). Predicting concreteness and imageability of words within and across languages via word embeddings. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP, Melbourne, Australia, July 20, 217–222.
Google Scholar

Montefinese, M., Ambrosini, E., Fairfield, B., & Mammarella, N. (2014). The adaptation of the Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) for Italian. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 887–903. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0405-3.
Google Scholar

Nippold, M. A. & Taylor, C. L. (2002). Judgments of Idiom Familiarity and TransparencyA Comparison of Children and Adolescents. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 45(2):384-91. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/030).
Google Scholar

Nordmann, E., & Jambazova, A. A. (2017). Normative data for idiomatic expressions. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 198–215. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0705-5.
Google Scholar

Nordmann, E., Cleland, A. A., & Bull, R. (2014). Familiarity breeds dissent: Reliability analyses for British-English idioms on measures of familiarity, meaning, literality, and decomposability. Acta Psychologica,1 49, 87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.03.009.
Google Scholar

Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Pena, E. A., & Slate, E. H. (2014). gvlma: Global Validation of Linear Models Assumptions. R package version 1.0.0.2, 5 April. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gvlma.
Google Scholar

Pollio, H. R., Barlow, J. M., Fine, H. J., & Pollio, M. R. (1977). Psychology and the poetics of growth: Figurative language in psychology, psychotherapy, and education. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Prabhakaran , S.(2017): 10 Assumptions of Linear Regression - Full List with Examples and Code, 5 April. Retrieved from http://r-statistics.co/Assumptions-of-Linear-Regression.html.
Google Scholar

Revelle, W. (2018). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, , 5 April. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version = 1.8.4.
Google Scholar

Ruginski, I. (2016): Checking the Assumptions of Linear Regression, 11 October. Retrieved from http://psych.utah.edu/people/graduate-students/ruginski-ian.php.
Google Scholar

Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714.
Google Scholar

Sabsevitz, D. S., Medler, D. A., Seidenberg, M. S., & Binder, J. R. (2005). Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability. NeuroImage, 27, 188–200. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.012.
Google Scholar

Schumann, J. H. (1998). The Neurobiology of Affect in Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Seongho, K. (2015). ppcor: Partial and Semi-Partial (Part) Correlation. R package version 1.1, 5 April. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ppcor.
Google Scholar

Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161-184.
Google Scholar

Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–534. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6.
Google Scholar

Tabossi, P., Arduino, L., & Fanari, R. (2011). Descriptive norms for 245 Italian idiomatic expressions. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 110–123. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0018-z.
Google Scholar

Titone, D. A., & Connine, C. M. (1994). Descriptive norms for 171 idiomatic expressions: Familiarity, compositionality, predictability and literality. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9, 247–270.
Google Scholar

Turner, N., & Katz, A. (1997). The availability of conventional and of literal meaning during the comprehension of proverbs. Pragmatics and Cognition, 5, 199–233.
Google Scholar

Udem, P. (2001). Redensarten-Index: Wörterbuch für Redensarten, Redewendungen, idiomatische Ausdrücke, feste Wortverbindungen. Retrieved December, 2013 from www.redensarten-index.de.
Google Scholar

Võ, M. L.-H., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, K., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin affective word list reloaded. Behavior Research Methods 41, 534–538.
Google Scholar

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019)
Published: 2019-07-25

ISSN: 2450-5455

eISSN: 2451-2125

10.31261/tapsla

Publisher

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego | University of Silesia Press

Submit