Covid and animals: Animal-human familiarness and animal space in the city in the times of the pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA.2023.12.04

Keywords:

COVID-19 pandemic, family, pets, urban ecosystem, free-living animals

Abstract

During the first, the second and the third wave of coronavirus infections in Poland, the authors conducted empirical online research inspired by the theoretical potential of everyday life sociology and the sociology of disaster. One of the interesting problems which came to the surface when the project was carried out, was the issue of changes in human-animal relations, in the behavi­our of animals during lockdown and in people’s own behaviour towards animals. Interpretations of the research results presented in this paper concern two spheres: the home sphere – with the animals which live in it – and the urban sphere – including the free-living animals (also homeless and abandoned ones). We believe that the results of this research contribute to the broadening of our knowledge on the matter of human-animal familiarness as well as on urban ecosystems and the possibilities of their cultural-environmental exploration.

Author Biographies

Lucyna Kopciewicz, University of Gdansk

Lucyna Kopciewicz – prof. Ph.D. She works at the Institute of Pedagogy, University of Gdańsk. Her research interests include gender and posthumanism, family contexts, care and the ethics of care.

Marcin Welenc, University of Gdansk

Marcin Welenc – Ph.D., assistant professor at the Institute of Pedagogy, University of Gdańsk. His research interests include queer theory, gender pedagogy, family pedagogy and issues of care and upbringing.

References

Aviva, Vincent, Hanna Mamzer, Zenithson Ng, Katleen J. Farkas. „People and their Pets in the Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Society Register, no. 4 (3) (2020): 111–128.

Bogunia-Borowska, Małgorzata. „Katastrofy, kataklizmy, klęski”. Kultura Współczesna. Teorie, interpretacje, praktyka, nr 2 (109) (2020): 10–15.

„COVID-19. Jak dotknął opiekunów psów – raport 2021”. Psy.pl.

Gajewska, Grażyna. „Człowiek/zwierzę/roślina/maszyna – perspektywa posthumanistyczna”. Studia Europaea Gnesnensia, nr 4 (2011): 225–246.

Kopciewicz, Lucyna. „Dom w doświadczeniach polskich kobiet w czasie pandemii COVID-19”. Lud. Organ Polskiego Towarzystwa Ludoznawczego, nr 104 (2020): 321–338.

Mamzer, Hanna. „Postmodern society and COVID-19 Pandemic: old, new and scary”. Society Register, no. 2 (4) (2020): 7–18.

Mamzer, Hanna. „Relacje osób w kryzysie bezdomności ze zwierzętami: wsparcie i zakorzenienie czy wykorzystywanie zwierząt?”. Praca Socjalna, nr 5 (2021): 107–128.

Packer, Rowena, Claire Brand, Zoe Belshaw, Camilla Pegram, Kim Stevens, and Dan O’Neill. „Pandemic Puppies: Characterising motivations and behaviours of UK owners who purchased puppies during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic”. Animals, no. 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092500.

Sznajderman, Monika. Zaraza. Mitologia dżumy, cholery i AIDS. Wołowiec: Wydawnictwo Czarne, 2020.

Sztompka, Piotr i Małgorzata Bogunia-Borowska. Socjologia codzienności. Kraków: Znak, 2008.

Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. Dyskurs jako struktura i proces. Przekład Grzegorz Grochowski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2001.

Wojnowski, Konrad. Pożyteczne katastrofy. Kraków: Universitas, 2016.

Zacharek, Natalia. „Zwierzę domowe jako członek rodziny w XIX i XXI wieku”. Tematy z Szewskiej, nr 2 (2017): 96–112.

Žižek, Slavoj. Pandemia! COVID-19 trzęsie światem. Przekład Jowita Maksymowicz-Hamann. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Relacja, 2020.

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Kopciewicz, L., & Welenc, M. (2023). Covid and animals: Animal-human familiarness and animal space in the city in the times of the pandemic. Zoophilologica. Polish Journal of Animal Studies, (2 (12), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31261/ZOOPHILOLOGICA.2023.12.04