Responsible Procreation—Co-Responsibility of Spouses. From Adequate Anthropology to the Legal Anthropology of Matrimony
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/PaCL.2020.06.03Keywords:
institution of matrimony, theological doctrine de matrimonio, adequate anthropology, legal anthropology of matrimony, responsible procreation, co-responsibility of spousesAbstract
This study successfully verifies the thesis that both eponymous anthropological criteria (responsible procreation and co-responsibility of spouses), referring to the nature of personae humanae, have an invaluable epistemological value in the matrimonial law. Opening a wider horizon of cognition and interpretation, they become indispensable in the accurate/reliable deciding of cases concerning the invalidity of marriage. The subsequent stages of the discourse proposed here, step by step from the general guidelines of adequate anthropology to the detailed assumptions of the legal anthropology of matrimony, have very clearly confirmed the words of John Paul II that “[…] an authentically juridical consideration of marriage requires a metaphysical vision of the human person and of the conjugal relationship” (Address to the Roman Rota, 2004).
References
Bañares, Juan Ignacio. “Persona y sexualidad humanas: de la antropología al derecho.” In El matrimonio y su expresión canónica ante el III milenio. X Congreso Internacional de Derecho Canónico, edited by Pedro-Juan Viladrich, Javier Escrivá-Ivars, Juan Ignacio Bañares, and Jorge Miras (Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra. EUNSA, 2000), 45–59.
Benedict XVI. “Address to the Members of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 27, 2007). http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2007/january/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20070127_roman-rota.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Benedict XVI. “Address to Participants at the Plenary Session of the International Theological Commission” (December 5, 2008). http://w2.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2008/december/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20081205_teologica.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Berkman, John, and William C. Mattison III, ed. Searching for a Universal Ethic: Multidisciplinary, Ecumenical, and Interfaith Responses to the Catholic Natural Law Tradition. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2014.
Bertolini, Giacomo. “Il matrimonio come istituzione: un vincolo di giustizia in quanto verità dell’amore.” Anthropotes, vol. 31 (2015): 213–252.
Bonino, Serge-Tomas. “Questions autour du document: À la recherche d’une éthique universelle. Nouveau regard sur la loi naturelle.” Transversalités, vol. 117, no. 1 (2011): 9–25.
Bonnet, Piero Antonio. “Il bonum coniugum come corresponsabilità degli sposi.” Apollinaris, vol. 83 (2010): 419–458.
Bonnet, Piero Antonio. “Das Wesen der Ehe und das Bonum Coniugum – eine Perspektive.” De processibus matrimonialibus, vol. 6 (1999): 27–37.
Brettmann, Stephanie Mar. Theories of Justice: A Dialogue with Karol Wojtyla and Karl Barth. Cambridge, England: James Clarke & Co, 2015.
Code of Canon Law (promulgated: January 25, 1983).
Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches (promulgated: October 18, 1990).
Crosby John F. “The Personalism of John Paul II as the Basis of His Approach to the Teaching of Humanae vitae.” Anthropotes, vol. 5 (1989): 54–62.
Errazuriz Mackenna, Carlos José. “Il senso e il contenuto essenziale del bonum coniugum.” Ius Ecclesiae, vol. 22 (2010): 573–590.
Franceschi, Héctor. “Il bonum prolis nello stato di vita matrimoniale e le conseguenze canoniche in caso di separazione o di nullità matrimoniale.” In Prole e matrimonio canonico, Studi Giuridici, vol. 62 (Città del Vaticano: LEV, 2003), 29–64.
Franceschi, Héctor, and Joan Carreras. Antropología jurídica de la sexualidad. Fundamentos para un derecho de familia. Caracas: Centro de Educación para la Familia y el Trabajo, 2000.
Francis, Pope. Apostolic Exhortation Amoris Laetitia (April 8, 2016). AAS, vol. 108 (2016): 311–446.
Francis, Pope. “Homily. Holy Mass and Rite of Canonization of Blesseds John XXIII and John Paul II (April 27, 2014).” http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/homilies/2014/documents/papa-francesco_20140427_omelia-canonizzazioni.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
Góralski, Wojciech. “Walor prawny małżeństwa i jego wymiar osobowy. Przemówienie papieża Jana Pawła II do Roty Rzymskiej 27 I 1997 r.” Ius Matrimoniale, vol. 2 (1997): 95–100.
Hervada, Javier. “Libertad, naturaleza y compromiso en la sexualidad humana.” Persona y Derecho, vol. 19 (1988): 99–119.
Hervada, Javier. “Obligaciones esenciales del matrimonio.” Ius Canonicum, vol. 31 (1991): 59–83.
Hervada, Javier, and Pedro Lombardía. El Derecho del Pueblo de Dios. Hacia un sistema de Derecho canónico, vol. 3/1: Derecho Matrimonial (Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, 1973).
Hittinger, Russell. “The Situation of Natural Law in Catholic Theology.” In Searching for a Universal Ethic: Multidisciplinary, Ecumenical, and Interfaith Responses to the Catholic Natural Law Tradition, edited by John Berkman and William C. Mattison III, 111–122.
Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2014.
International Theological Commission. “In Search of a Universal Ethic: New Look on Natural Law” (2009). http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20090520_legge-naturale_pl.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
John Paul II. “Address to the Members of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota for the Inauguration of the Judicial Year” (January 29, 2004). http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/2004/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20040129_roman-rota.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
John Paul II. “Address to the Prelate Auditors, Officials and Advocates of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (February 1, 2001). http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/2001/february/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_20010201_rota-romana.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
John Paul II. “Address to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 28, 1991). http://w2.vatican. va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/1991/january/documents/hf_ jp-ii_spe_19910128_roman-rota.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
John Paul II. “Address to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 27, 1997). http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/1997/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19970127_rotaromana.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
John Paul II. “Address to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota” (January 21, 1999). http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/speeches/1999/january/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19990121_rota-romana.html. Accessed: December 13, 2018.
John Paul II. Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris Consortio (November 22, 1981). AAS, vol. 73 (1982): 81–191.
John Paul II. Encyclical Letter Veritatis Splendor (August 6, 1993). AAS, vol. 85 (1993): 1133–1228.
John Paul II. Letter to Families Gratissimam Sane (February 2, 1994). AAS, vol. 86 (1994): 868–925.
Kupczak, Jaroslaw. Gift and Communion: John Paul II’s Theology of the Body. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2014.
Lopez Aranda, Manuel. “La relación interpersonal, base del matrimonio.” In El «consortium totius vitae». Curso de Derecho matrimonial y procesal canónico para profesionales del foro, vol. 7 (Salamanca: Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, 1986), 189–238.
Lüdecke, Norbert. “Der Ausschluss des bonum coniugum. Ein Ehenichtigkeitsgrund mit Startschwierigkeiten.” De processibus matrimonialibus, vol. 2 (1995): 117–192.
Lüdicke, Klaus. “Die Ehezwecke im nachkonziliaren Eherecht – Wunsch und Wirklichkeit.” De processibus matrimonialibus, vol. 3 (1996): 39–58.
Lüdicke, Klaus. “Matrimonial Consent in Light of a Personalist Concept of Marriage: On the Council’s New Way of Thinking about Marriage.” Studia Canonica, vol. 33 (1999): 473–503.
Melina, Livio. “Ecologia dell’amore coniugale: l’Humanae vitae nella luce dell’Enciclica Laudato si.’” Anthropotes, vol. 31 (2015): 255–269.
Navarrete, Urbano. Structura iuridica matrimonii secundum Concilium Vaticanum II. Momentum iuridicum amoris coniugalis. Roma: Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1994.
Pastwa, Andrzej. “Amor benevolentiae – ius responsabile: oś interpersonalnego projektu małżeńsko-rodzinnego.” In Miłość i odpowiedzialność – wyznaczniki kanonicznego przygotowania do małżeństwa, edited by Andrzej Pastwa and Monika Gwóźdź, 13–31. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 2013.
Pastwa, Andrzej. “Code’s Standards Regarding Marriage and the Hallenges.” In Hodie et Cras. Today and Tomorrow of the 1983 Code of Canon Law Thirty Years after Promulagation, edited by Krzysztof Burczak, 35–52. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, 2015.
Pastwa, Andrzej. “Il matrimonio: comprensione personalistica e istituzionale.” Ius Ecclesiae, vol. 25 (2013): 387–408.
Pastwa, Andrzej. “Odpowiedzialna prokreacja personalistyczną inkarnacją bonum prolis?” In Vir Ecclesiae deditus. Księga dla uczczenia Księdza Profesora Edwarda Góreckiego, edited by Waldemar Irek, 205–226. Wrocław: Papieski Wydział Teologiczny, 2011.
Pastwa, Andrzej. Prawne znaczenie miłości małżeńskiej.Katowice: Księgarnia Św. Jacka, 1999.
Paul VI. Encyclical Letter Humanae Vitae (Juny 25, 1968). AAS, vol. 60 (1968): 481–503.
Rickert, Kevin. “Wojtlya’s Personalistic Norm: A Thomistic Analysis.” Nova et Vetera, vol. 7, no. 3 (2009): 653–678.
Schöch, Nikolaus. Die kirchenrechtliche Interpretation der Grundprinzipien der christlichen Anthropologie als Voraussetzung für die eheprozessrechtliche Beurteilung der psychischen Ehekonsensunfähigkeit. Eine kanonistische Studie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der päpstlichen Allokutionen und der Judikatur der Römischen Rota. Adnotationes in ius canonicum, Bd 15. Frankfurt am Main–Berlin–Bern–Bruxelles–New York–Wien: Peter Lang, 1999.
Serrano Ruiz, José María. “L’esclusione della prole e la sua assolutezza: il problema della paternità responsabile.” In Prole e matrimonio canonico, Studi Giuridici, vol. 62, 153–166. Città del Vaticano: LEV, 2003.
Somme, Luc-Tomas. “À propos du document À la recherche d’une éthique universelle, Nouveau regard sur la loi naturelle.” Revue thomiste, vol. 109 (2009): 639–646.
Thomas Aquinas. Summa theologica. Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1886.
Vatican Council II. Pastoral Constitution on the Church Gaudium et Spes (December 7, 1965). AAS, vol. 58 (1966): 1025–1115.
Waldstein, Michael. “Three Kinds of Personalism: Kant, Scheler and John Paul II.” Forum Teologiczne, vol. 10 (2009): 151–171.
Wojtyla, Karol, Cardinal. The Acting Person. Translated by Andrzej Potocki and edited by AnnaTeresa Tymieniecka. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing. Company, 1979.
Wojtyla, Karol. Love and Responsibility. Translated by Harry T. Willetts. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1993.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
