“New Human Rights” and the Ban on Sexual Intercourse between Relatives. Legal Contemplation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/PaCL.2020.06.04Keywords:
human rights, incest, sexual decency, feminismAbstract
The classic conception of human rights, expressed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights signed in Paris on December 10, 1948, has been receiving attempts at reinterpretation in the recent 50 years. The appearance of the concept of “new human rights” in the public sphere serves as an example here. However, the scope of the term “new rights” and the precise meaning of “reproductive and sexual rights” are not entirely known. The change in perception of human sexuality, the affirmation of sexual liberation, and the acceptance of violating social taboo in the name of the “new human rights” invites reflection on how the concept of sexual rights relates to the ban on sexual contacts between relatives. Does a ban on incest lose its rationale in modern times, and does the penalisation of such acts constitute merely anachronistic oppression? Are the currently enforced normative solutions clear and free of questions and controversy in this matter? Lastly, one is compelled to inquire whether sexual contacts between relatives are perhaps already among the “new human rights.” The present article endeavours to answer these questions.
References
John XXIII. Encyklika Pacem in Terris. Kraków: Wydawnictwo M, 2003. Supreme Court decision of 21 May 2008 in the case VKK 139/08, Prokuratura i Prawo 2008, No. 12.
European Parliament Resolution of 10 March 2015 on progress on equality between women and men in the European Union, 2014/2217(INI).
European Parliament Resolution of 20 February 2015 on the Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World 2013 and the European Union’s policy on the matter, 2014/2216(INI).
European Parliament Resolution of 9 June 2015 on the EU Strategy for equality between women and men, post 2015, 2014/2152(INI).
Decree of the President of Poland of 11 July 1932, Criminal Code (Dz.U.1932. 60.571).
Act of 19 April 1969, Criminal Code (Dz.U.1969.13.94).
Act of 6 June 1997, Criminal Code (Dz.U.1997.88.553; consolidated text: Dz.U.2018.1600).
ECHR decision of 22 January 2008 in case No. 43546/02 E.B. v. France.
ECHR decision of 12 April 2012 in case No. 43547/08 Stübing v. Germany, LEX No. 1130518.
Adolphe, Jane. “‘Gender’ Wars at the United Nations,” Ave Maria Law Review, vol. 11 (2012): 1–31.
Andrejew, Igor. Polskie prawo karne w zarysie. Warszawa: PWN, 1989.
Archibald, Elizabeth. Incest and the Medieval Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Banasik, Katarzyna. “Karalność kazirodztwa jako naruszenie wolności seksualnej,” in Konteksty prawa i praw człowieka, edited by Zyta Maria Dymińska, 37–46. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM, 2012.
Banasik, Katarzyna. “W kwestii penalizacji kazirodztwa,” Prokuratura i Prawo, vol. 4 (2011): 65–72.
Baranowski, Jan. “Ratio legis prawnokarnego zakazu kazirodztwa,” Przegląd Prawa Karnego, n. 3 (1990): 62–66.
Bassa, Bożena. “Prawa reprodukcyjne i seksualne jako ‘nowe prawa’ człowieka,” Studia nad Rodziną, vol. 30–31(2012), n. 1–2, 363–377.
Bojarski, Marek. Prawo karne materialne. Część ogólna i szczególna. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2004.
Braciak, Joanna. Prawo do prywatności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, 2004.
Dobrowolska, Karolina. “Prawa reprodukcyjne i seksualne w ONZ i ich doktrynalne uwarunkowania,” Zeszyty Prawnicze, vol. 16, no. 2 (2016): 163–181.
Filar, Marian. Przestępstwa seksualne w nowym kodeksie karnym. In Nowa kodyfikacja karna. Krótkie komentarze, edited by Andrzej Leciak. Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości. Departament Kadr i Szkolenia, Warszawa 1997, z 2, 45.
Gardocki, Lech. Prawo karne. Warszawa: C.H. BECK, 1998.
Gerety, Tom. “Redefining Privacy,” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, vol. 12, no. 2 (1977): 1–23.
Góralski, Wojciech. Kanoniczne prawo małżeńskie. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Prawnicze Iuris, 2000.
Górniok Oktawia, Hoc Stanisław, and Przyjemski Stanisław. Kodeks karny: komentarz, vol. 3. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo ARCHE, 1999.
Greniuk, Franciszek. “Od Powszechnej Deklaracji Praw Człowieka do Karty Praw Podstawowych.” In Prawa człowieka. Przesłanie moralne Kościoła, edited by Krzysztof Jeżyna and Tadeusz Zadykowicz, 16–17. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, 2010.
Leszczyński, Juliusz. “O projektach reformy przepisów dotyczących przestępstw seksualnych,” Państwo i Prawo, vol. 2 (1992): 80–84.
Marek, Andrzej. Kodeks karny. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2010.
Mozgawa, Marek, ed. Kodeks karny. Komentarz. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2014.
Nowicki, Marek. Europejska Konwencja Praw Człowieka. Warszawa: Oficyna Wolters Kluwer, 2007.
Piasecki, Kazimierz, ed. Kodeks rodzinny i opiekuńczy. Komentarz. Warszawa: LexisNexis, 2009.
Rodzynkiewicz, Mateusz. “Przestępstwa przeciwko wolności seksualnej.” In Kodeks karny. Część szczególna. Komentarz do art. 117–277, vol. 2, edited by Andrzej Zoll. Kraków: Kantor Wydawniczy Zakamycze. Oddział Polskich Wydawnictw Profesjonalnych, 2006.
Sakowicz, Andrzej. Prawnokarne gwarancje prywatności. Kraków: Zakamycze, 2006.
Schooyans, Michael. Ukryte oblicze ONZ. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Kultury Społecznej i Medialnej, 2002.
Skorowski, Henryk. Problematyka praw człowieka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UKSW, 2005.
Surkont, Mirosław. Prawo karne. Podręcznik dla studentów administracji. Sopot: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze Lex, 1998.
Szwejkowska, Małgorzata, and Bronisław Sitek. “Karnoprawny zakaz stosunków kazirodczych.” Studia Prawnoustrojowe, vol. 23 (2014): 31–47.
Tomkiewicz, Małgorzata. “Kazirodztwo a prawnokarna ochrona rodziny w Polsce.” Polityka Społeczna i Resocjalizacyjna, vol. 21 (2013): 25–44.
Warylewski, Jarosław. “Zakaz kazirodztwa w kodeksie karnym oraz w ujęciu porównawczym,” Przegląd Sądowy, vol. 5 (2001): 66–97.
Zoll, Andrzej. “Ochrona prywatności w prawie karnym. ” Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych, vol. 1 (2000): 221–228.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
