Incorrect application of the provisions on service of process of prosecutor’s decision to approval of seized and searched property
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/PPK.2021.05.07Keywords:
search and seizure, service of process, approval for seizure, public prosecutor, preparatory proceedings, urgent cases, public prosecutor’s decisions, appealAbstract
In the presented article, the author analyzes practical issues related to the service of process of the public prosecutor’s decisions related to the search and seizure during the course of the preparatory proceedings. The first part of the paper discusses the search and seizure regulations in urgent cases. In the course of further deliberations, the focus is on search and seizure regulations, obligation on the service of public prosecutor’s decisions and opportunity of its appealing. The author points out that this practice is wrong and suggest what the optimal solution should look like, even without legislative changes, but with the right interpretation of the current regulations. All the considerations lead him to present his own final conclusions and de lege ferenda postulates.
References
Janusz-Pohl B.: Formalizacja i konwencjonalizacja jako instrumenty analizy czynności karnoprocesowych w prawie polskim. Poznań 2017.
Kaznowski A.: Problematyka przeszukania mieszkania. Prok. i Pr. 2010, nr 4.
Koper R.: Przeszukanie w wypadkach niecierpiących zwłoki. Prok. i Pr. 2014, nr 11.
Kremens K.: Przeszukanie. W: System prawa karnego procesowego. Tom VIII. Dowody. Część 2. Red. J. Skorupka. Warszawa 2019.
Nawacki M.: Komentarz do art. 217 i 220 k.p.k. W: Kodeks postępowania karnego. T. I: Komentarz. Art. 1-424. Red. D. Drajewicz. Warszawa 2020.
Pachowicz Z.: Komentarz do art. 100 k.p.k. W: Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz. Red. J. Skorupka. Warszawa 2020.
Sakowicz A.: Przeszukanie mieszkania a prawa do poszanowania prywatności jednostki. W: Teoretyczne i praktyczne problemy współczesnego prawa karnego. Księga pamiątkowa z okazji Jubileuszu 70. urodzin Profesora Tadeusza Bojarskiego. Red. A. Michalska-Warias, I. Nowikowski, J. Piórkowska-Flieger. Lublin 2011.
Skorupka J.: Czynności legalne warunkowo. Prok. i Pr. 2015, nr 1–2.
Skorupka J.: Komentarz do art. 217 i 220 k.p.k. W: Kodeks postępowania karnego. Komentarz. Red. Idem. Warszawa 2020.
Skorupka J.: Konstytucyjne i konwencyjne granice przeszukania w postępowaniu karnym (cz. 1). Pal. 2007, nr 9–10.
Skorupka J.: Konstytucyjne i konwencyjne granice przeszukania w postępowaniu karnym (cz. 2). Pal. 2007, nr 11–12.
Stefański R.A., Zabłocki S.: Kodeks postępowania karnego. T. II. Komentarz do art. 167-296. Warszawa 2018.
Świecki D.: Kodeks postępowania karnego. T. I. Komentarz aktualizowany. LEX/el. 2020.
Woźniewski K.: Zagadnienie niewadliwości czynności procesowych postępowania przygotowawczego. W: System Prawa Karnego Procesowego. Tom X. Postępowanie przygotowawcze. Red. R.A. Stefański. Warszawa 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
