Interakcja kryminalistyki i prawa karnego oraz jej odzwierciedlenie w postępowaniu dowodowym czeskiego systemu prawnego

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/PPK.2024.08.01.05

Słowa kluczowe:

Criminalistics, evidence, criminal procedural law, legal regulation

Abstrakt

The paper deals primarily with the issue of evidence in criminal proceedings, in relation to the criminalistic procedures by which individual pieces of evidence are obtained. The introductory part focuses on a general analysis of the relationship between criminalistics and criminal law and on the relevance of criminalistics for legal practice.
The main part of the paper is devoted to the area of evidence. The area of evidence is the centre of gravity of the entire criminal proceedings, and therefore the upcoming recodification of the Czech criminal procedural law may bring improvements to the current situation in this area as well. De lege ferenda considerations will be devoted to the analysis of the question whether criminalistic methods and procedures should be regulated directly in the Criminal Procedure Code, as is the case with the so-called special methods of evidence, or whether such a procedure is not appropriate.

Bibliografia

Chiavari, Mario. “Principles of Criminal Procedure and Their Application in Disciplinary Proceedings”. “International Review of Penal Law”, vol. 72, no. 3 (2001), 721–728.

Fryšták, Marek, Texl, David. “The relationship between criminalistics nad criminal law and its importance as a non-legal science of criminal law is the teaching of criminal law at faculties of law (in The Czech Republic)”. In: Henryk Malewski, Snieguolé Matuliené, Gabrielé Juodkaité-Granskiené. Development of criminalistics theory and future of forensic expertology: liber amicorum profesoriui Egidijui Vidmantui Kurapkai. Vilnius: Forensic Science Center of Lithuania, Mykolo Romerius University, 2022.

Lai, Ho Hack. A Philosophy of Evidence Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Pješčak, Ján et al. Kriminalistika. Praha: Naše vojsko, 1986.

Signorelli, Wlater. Criminal Law, Procedure, and Evidence. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2011.

Straus, Jiří et al. Úvod do kriminalistiky. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, s. r. o., 2004.

Straus, Jiří, Vavera, František et al. Dějiny kriminalistiky. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, s. r. o., 2012.

Svoboda, Ivo et al. Kriminalistika. Ostrava: KEY Publishing s. r. o., 2016, 374.

Šámal, Pavel, Musil, Jan, Kuchta, Josef et al. Trestní parvo procesní. Praha: C.H.Beck, 2013.

Other sources

Britannica “criminalistics” March 1, 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/criminalistics.

Goodwin University “Criminal Justice vs. Criminology vs. Criminalistics; What´s the Difference?”, February 2, 2024, https://www.goodwin.edu/enews/criminology-vs-criminal-justice/.

Pracovní tým Metoda pachové identifikace a Oddělení koncepce a strategické koordinace Policejního prezidia České republiky: “Rizika aplikační praxe metody pachové identifikace v Policii České republiky”, https://www.pecina.cz/files/Zaverecna_zprava_PPCR_bez-data.pdf.

Opublikowane

2024-06-19

Jak cytować

Texl, D. (2024). Interakcja kryminalistyki i prawa karnego oraz jej odzwierciedlenie w postępowaniu dowodowym czeskiego systemu prawnego. Problemy Prawa Karnego, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31261/PPK.2024.08.01.05

Numer

Dział

Artykuły Problemowe