Adams, Robert M. 1979. “Theories of Actuality”. In: Michael J. Loux, ed. The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, s. 190-209.
Google Scholar

Allén, Sture, ed. 1989. Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65. Berlin: de Gruyter
Google Scholar

Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Jak udělat něco slovy. Tłum. J. Pechar et al., Praha: Filosofia, 2000. Mówienie i poznawanie: rozprawy i wykłady filozoficzne / John Langshaw Austin; przeł. [z ang.], wstępem i przypisami opatrzył oraz skorowidze sporządził Bohdan Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa : Wydaw. Naukowe PWN, 1993.
Google Scholar

Austin, John Langshaw. 1970. Philosophical Papers. 2. vyd. Eds. J. O. Urmson a G. J. Warnock. Oxford: Clarendon (I wyd. 1961).
Google Scholar

Austin, John Langshaw. 1971. "Performative-Constative." In: The Philosophy of Language. Ed. J. R. Searle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 13-22.
Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1967. “Le discours de l’histoire”. Social Science Information, s. 65-75 (ang. tłum. in Comparative Criticism: A Yearbook. Vol. 3. Tł. S. Bann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981, s. 7-20).
Google Scholar

Bricker, Phillip. 2008. “Concrete Possible Worlds”. In: Theodor Sider et al., eds. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. London: Blackwell, 2008. S. 111-134.
Google Scholar

Cohn, Dorrit. 1989. “Fictional versus Historical Lives: Borderlines and Borderline Cases.” Journal of Narrative Technique 19: 3-24 (rpt. in The Distinction of Fiction, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998, po czesku Praha: Academia, 2009).
Google Scholar

Coste, Didier. 1989. Narrative as Communication. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Google Scholar

Cresswell, M.J. 1988. Semantical Essays: Possible Worlds and Their Rivals. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Crittenden, Charles. 1991. Unreality: The Metaphysics of Fictional Objects. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar

Currie, Gregory. 1984/85. “What is Fiction?”. Journal for Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43: 385-392.
Google Scholar

Červenka, Miroslav. 2003. Fikční světy lyriky. Praha: Paseka.
Google Scholar

Doležel, Lubomír. 1998. Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (po czesku Praha: Karolinum, 2003).
Google Scholar

Doležel, Lubomír. 2010. Possible Worlds of Fiction and History: The Postmodern Stage. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (czeska wersja: Fikce a historie v období postmoderny. Praha: Academia, 2008).
Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1989a. “Report on Session 3: Literature and Arts”. In Allén, ed. 1989. Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65. Berlin: de Gruyter, s. 343-355.
Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1989b. “Small Worlds”. VS. Versus 52/53: 53-70.
Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1994. Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Cambridge MA.: Harvard University Press. (po polsku: Sześć przechadzek po lesie fikcji; przeł. [z ang.] Jerzy Jarniewicz. Kraków : "Znak", 1995)
Google Scholar

Elam, Keir. 1980. The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. London: Methuen.
Google Scholar

Fořt, Bohumil. 2005. Úvod do sémantiky fikčních světů. Brno: Host.
Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. 1892. "Über Sinn und Bedeutung". Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100: 25-50 (cyt. za Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: Fünf logische Studien. III wyd. Ed. Günther Patzig. Gőttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1969, 40-65).
Google Scholar

Gareth, Evans. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Ed. John McDowell. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Google Scholar

(po polsku: Jak tworzymy świat; przeł. [z ang.] Michał Szczubiałka. Warszawa : Fundacja "Aletheia", 1997)
Google Scholar

Heijenoort van, Jean. 1967. “Logic as Language and Logic as Calculus”. Synthèse 17: 324-330.
Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko. 1989. “Exploring Possible Worlds”. In Allén, ed. 1989. Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65. Berlin: de Gruyter, s. 52-73.
Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko. 1997. Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator: An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1933/34. “Co je poezie?”. Volné směry 30: 229-239. Cyt. za Červenka, ed. 1995, 23-33.
Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1995. Poetická funkce. Ed. Miroslav Červenka, Praha: H&H, 1995.
Google Scholar

Kanger, Stig. 1957.
Google Scholar

Kanyó, Zoltan. 1980. "Semantik für heimatlose Gegenstände. Die Bedeutung von Meinongs Gegestandtheorie für die Theorie der Fiktionalität." Studia poetica. Tom 3. Ed. Z. Kanyó, s. 3-114.
Google Scholar

Koťátko, Petr. 2006. Interpretace a subjektivita. Praha: Filosofia.
Google Scholar

Koťátko, Petr, et al., eds. 2010. Fictionality – Probability – Reality. Bratislava: Aleph.
Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. 1963. “Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic”. Acta Philosophica Fennica 10: 83-94. Cyt. za Farhang Zabeeh et. al., eds. Readings in Semantics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1974. 803-814.
Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. (po polsku: Nazywanie a konieczność; przeł. [z ang.] Bohdan Chwedeńczuk. Warszawa : "Pax", 1988, cyt. s. 47)
Google Scholar

Kusch, Martin. 1989. Language as Calculus vs. Language as Universal Medium. Dordrecht: Kluver.
Google Scholar

Lycan, William G. 1979. "The Trouble with Possible Worlds." In: Loux, ed. 1979, s. 274-316.
Google Scholar

Margolin, Uri. 1987. "Introducing and Sustaining Characters in Literary Narrative: A Set of Conditions." Style 21: 107-124.
Google Scholar

Melia, Joseph. 2008. “Ersatz Possible Worlds”. In Theodor Sider et al., eds. Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. London: Blackwell, s.135-151.
Google Scholar

Munslow, Alun. 1997. Deconstructing History. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Nolt, John Eric. 1984. Informal Logic: Possible Worlds and Imagination. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara H. 1989. “Possible Worlds in Model-Theoretic Semantics; A Linguistic Perspective”. In: Allén, ed. 1989, s. 93-123.
Google Scholar

Pavel, Thomas G. 1975/76. "Possible Worlds in Literary Semantics". The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34: 165-176.
Google Scholar

Pavel, Thomas G. 1986. Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Google Scholar

Perry, John. 1989. “Possible Worlds and Subject Matter: Discussion of Barbara H. Partee”s Paper ‘Possible Worlds in Model-Thoretic Semantics: A Linguistic Perspective’”. In Allén, ed. 1989. Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65. Berlin: de Gruyter, s. 124-137.
Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. 1974. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon.
Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas. 1975. A Theory of Possibility: A Constructivistic and Conceptualist Account of Possible Individuals and Possible Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.
Google Scholar

Ronen, Ruth. 1994. Possible Worlds in Literary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Russell, Betrand. 1919. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin – New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 1991. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narative Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Google Scholar

Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2001. Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and in Electronic Media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1974/75. "The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse." New Literary History 6: s. 319-332. Cit. z Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979. 58-75.
Google Scholar

Semino, Elena. 1997. Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. New York: Longman.
Google Scholar

Slinin, J.A. 1967. “Teorija modal’nostej v sovremennoj logike”. In Logičeskaja semantika i modal’naja logika. Ed. P.V. Tavanec. Moskva: Nauka. 119-147.
Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert C. 1984. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Google Scholar

Walton, Kendall L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

White, Hayden. 1973. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

White, Hayden. 1978. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar

Wimsatt, William, and Monroe C. Beardsley. 1965. Hateful Contraries: Studies in Literature and Criticism. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas. 1989. ‘Discussion of Lubomír Doležel’s Paper ‘Possible Worlds and Literary Fictions’” In Allén, ed. 1989. Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65. Berlin: de Gruyter, s. 243-249.
Google Scholar

Yagisawa, Takashi. 1968. “Beyond Possible Worlds”. Philosophical Studies 53: 175-204.
Google Scholar