Postsowieckość ≠  poskolonialność ≠  postimperialność,  czyli co robić po końcu historii?

Madina Tłostanowa

Published: 2015-11-15

No. 31 (2015)

Post-sovietness ≠ Post-coloniality ≠ Post-imperiality, or what to do after the End of History?

Madina Tłostanowa

Website: https://decolonialsummerschool.wordpress.com/people/madina-tlostanova/

Abstract

The article contemplates social and cultural consequences of the fall of communism as the dominating socio-political ideology and some attempts to fill up the ideological void left by the withering dogmas of the previous regime. One of the discourses, whose premises seem applicable to the post-soviet reality, is post-colonial theory. However, its immediate application does not seem possible for the variety of geo-political reasons which result in a sense of ideological disappointment turning Russians into new subalterns, devoid of their former imperialist pride and uncertain of their status in the globalized and still globalizing world.

Keywords:

Russia , The Fall of Soviet Union , Postcolonialism , Identity , Globalisation

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Tłostanowa, M. (2015). Post-sovietness ≠ Post-coloniality ≠ Post-imperiality, or what to do after the End of History?. Er(r)go. Theory - Literature - Culture, (31). Retrieved from https://trrest.vot.pl/ojsus/index.php/ERRGO/article/view/4011

References

Alban Achinte Adolfo. 2006. „Conocimiento y lugar: más allá de la razón hay un mundo de colores”, W Texiendo textos y saberes. Cinco hijos para pensar los estudios culturales, la colonialidad y la interculturalidad. Editorial Universidad del Cauca Popayán [Colección Estiodios (Inter) culturales].
Google Scholar

Chatterjee Partha. 1993. The Nation and Its Fragments. Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Crenshaw Kimberle. 1989. „Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics”. The University of Chicago Legal Forum : 139–167
Google Scholar

Dainotto Roberto. 2000. “A South with a View: Europe and Its Other”. Nepantla 1.2 : 375–390.
Google Scholar

Hinkelammert Franz Josef. 2004. “The Hidden Logic of Modernity: Locke and the Inversion of Human Rights”. Worlds and Knowledges Otherwise. A Web Dossier, vol. 1, dossier 1, (10.08.2011).
Google Scholar

Lorde Audre. 1984. “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House”. W Sister Outsider. Essays and Speeches. Freedom: Crossing Press.
Google Scholar

Maldonado Torres Nelson. 2007. “On the Coloniality of Being: Contributions to the Development of a Concept”. Cultural Studies 21 (2–3) March/May : 240–270.
Google Scholar

Martin Terry. 2001. Affirmative Action Empire. Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union, 1923–1939. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar

McClintock Anne. 1992. “The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term ‘Post-Colonialism’”. Social Text 31/32: Third World and Post-Colonial Issues : 84–98.
Google Scholar

Moore David Chioni. 2001. “Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? Toward a Global Postcolonial Critique”. PMLA 116.1 : 111–128.
Google Scholar

Penzin Aleksiej. “Post-Soviet Singularity and Codes of Cultural Translation”. The Latvian Center for Contemporary Art. < http://old.lcca.lv/e-texts/17> (10.08.2011).
Google Scholar

Sahni Kalpana. 1997. Crucifying the Orient. Bangkok: White Orchid Press.
Google Scholar

Suchland Jennifer. 2011. “Is postsocialism transnational?”. Signs. Journal of Women in Culture and Society.
Google Scholar

Tlostanova Madina. 2010. Gender Epistemologies and Eurasian Borderlands. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar

Cухланд Дж. 2011. „Существует ли постсоциалистическая критика?”. Личность. Культура. Общество 3–4.
Google Scholar

Ключевский Василий. 2009. Курс русской истории. Москва: Альфа-Книга.
Google Scholar

Тлостанова Мадина Владимировна. 2004. Постсоветская литература и эстетика транскультурации. Москва: УРСС.
Google Scholar

Тлостанова Мадина. 2011. „Постсоветское ≠ постколониальное ≠ постимперское, или Что делать после конца истории?”. Личность. Культура. Общество 13 (67/68) : 94–103.
Google Scholar

Тлостанова Мадина Владимировна. 2009. “Деколониальный проект: от политической деколонизации к деколонизации мышления и сознания”. Личность. Культура. Общество 1.
Google Scholar

Madina Tłostanowa

madina.tlostanova@gmail.com

Affiliation:

Russian Presidential Academy of national Economy and Public Administration, Moscow Russian Federation

Bio Statement (e.g., department and rank)

Madina Tłostanova jest teoretykiem kultury i profesorem filozofii w Rosyjskiej Prezydenckiej Akademii Gospodarki Narodowej i Administracji Publicznej w Moskwie. Jej zainteresowania naukowe koncentrują się wokół problemów dekolonizacji, postglobalizmu, obrazowaniu, literaturze i sztuce doby postsocjalistycznej. Prowadzi także badania w obszarze feminizmu krajów nie-zachodnich oraz rozwija studia genderowe. Zajmuje się również problematyką krytycznej rewizji euroazjatyckich dyskursów historii imperialnej i kolonialnej.

ER(R)GO No. 31 (2/2015) - Russian Literary Theory (guest-edited by Piotr Fast)

No. 31 (2015)
Published: 2015-11-15

ISSN: 1508-6305

eISSN: 2544-3186

10.31261/errgo

Publisher

University of Silesia Press | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego i Wydawnictwo Naukowe "Śląsk"

Submit

Post-sovietness ≠ Post-coloniality ≠ Post-imperiality, or what to do after the End of History?

Abstract

Keywords:

Madina Tłostanowa

Language

Information

Make a Submission