Impact of rape-myths on judiciary proceedings: A lack of acknowledgement in the European Court of Human Rights case-law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/FPK.2022.03.02

Keywords:

rape myths, sexual violence, gender stereotypes, European Court of Human Rights, discrimination

Abstract

Rape myths can be defined as prejudicial, stereotyped or false beliefs about rape, rape victims, and rapists, and they include common opinions whereby women mean “yes” when they say “no”; women provoke rape; if a woman does not want to be raped, she will just fight back at any cost. These pervasive social attitudes can have a detrimental effect on victims of sexual violence, especially when employed by authorities during official proceedings. As such, this article aims at analyzing to what extent rape myths affect the perception of victims of sexual violence during the official proceedings on the example of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Thus the first part explains the notion of rape myths, while the second part provides an analysis of the jurisprudence of the ECHR. Lastly, the final part suggests new approach to cases concerning sexual violence.

Author Biography

Karolina Prażmowska-Marcinowska, University of Silesia in Katowice

Karolina Prażmowska-Marcinowska is a Ph.D.student and a member of the Research Group of Public International Law and European Law at the Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Silesia (Poland).

References

Amnesty International, Violence Against Women. The Perspective of Students in Northern Ireland, Amnesty International UK, September 2008.

Burt, M.R., Cultural myths and supports for rape, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 38, 1980.

CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008, Karen Tayag Vertido v. The Philippines (No. 18/08).

Council of Europe, Equal Access to Justice in the Case-Law on Violence against Women before the European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg September 2015.

Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women, United Nations General Assembly, Resolution 48/104 of 20 December 1993.

ECHR, Aydın v. Turkey (Application no. 57/1996/676/866).

ECHR, D.H. and Others v. Czech Republic (Application no. 57325/00).

ECHR, D.J. v. Croatia (Application no. 42418/10).

ECHR, Eremia v. the Republic of Moldova (Application no. 3564/11).

ECHR, I.P. v. Moldova, (Application no. 33708/12).

ECHR, Kiyutin v. Russia (Application no. 2700/10).

ECHR, M.C. v. Bulgaria (Application no. 39272/98).

ECHR, M.G.C. v. Romania, (Application no. 61495/11).

ECHR, Opuz v. Turkey (Application no. 33401/02).

ECHR, T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova (Application no. 26608/11).

ECHR, X and Y v. the Netherlands (Application no. 8978/80).

Edwards, K.M. et al., Rape myths: history, individual and institutional level presence, and implications for change, “Sex Roles”, Vol. 65, Issue 11–12, 2011.

Gerards, J.H., Judicial Review in Equal Treatment Cases, Martinus Nijhoff, 2005.

McGlynn,C. Rape, torture and the European Convention on Human Rights, “International and Comparative Law Quarterly”, Vol. 58, Issue 3, 2009.

Peroni, L., Clothes on trial: M.G.C. and the need to combat rape stereotypes, “Strasbourg Observers”, April 20, 2016, https://strasbourgobservers.com/2016/04/20/clothes-on-trial-m-g-c-and-the-need-to-combat-rape-stereotypes/.

Radacic, I., Gender equality jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, “The European Journal of International Law”, Vol. 19, no. 4, 2008.

Stevenson,K., Unequivocal victims: the historical roots of the mystification of the female complainant in rape cases, “Feminist Legal Studies”, Vol. 8, 2000.

Temkin, J. et al., Different functions of rape myth use in court: Findings from a trial observation study, “Feminist Criminology”, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2018.

Timmer,A., Toward an anti-stereotyping approach for the European Court of Human Rights, “Human Rights Law Review”, Vol. 11, Issue 4, 2011.

Torrey, M., When will we be believed – rape myths and the idea of a fair trial in rape prosecutions, “U.C. Davis L. Review”, Vol. 1012, No. 24, 1991.

Young, M.I., Five faces of oppression, in: Geographic Thought: A Praxis Perspective, G.L. Henderson & M. Waterstone (eds.), Routledge 2008.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-21

How to Cite

Prażmowska-Marcinowska, Karolina. 2022. “Impact of Rape-Myths on Judiciary Proceedings: A Lack of Acknowledgement in the European Court of Human Rights Case-Law”. Forum Polityki Kryminalnej [Forum on Criminal Policy], no. 1(3) (June):1-24. https://doi.org/10.31261/FPK.2022.03.02.

Issue

No. 1(3) (2022)

Section

Articles

License

The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.

1. License

The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.

2. Author’s Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.

If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".

ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).

3. User Rights

Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.

4. Co-Authorship

If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.

I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.