MOOCs: Global Business Goals and Local Educational Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2024.10.1.02Keywords:
MOOC, reactivity, individualism, collectivism, personal development, contextAbstract
MOOCs are prepared by universities, research centers, business and governmental bodies. That is a device with which academic centers spread state-of-the-art knowledge, while business entities facilitate the development of competencies, particularly in business, economics and IT. The paradox is that although MOOCs courses are open to global users, they contain distinctive features of their inventors’ and administrators’ culture because they have been created locally. In order to identify the cultural characteristics evident in the content of MOOC courses, 267 courses on creative writing posted on five platforms were analyzed: Coursera (USA), FutureLearn (UK), XuetangX (China), JMOOC (Japan) and Skill Academy (Indonesia). Skill Academy and Coursera were focused on business-marketing goals, although they represented different cultures. Chinese, Japanese and Indonesian courses reflected the responsiveness of those cultures and were people- and affiliation-oriented. They employed a holistic approach to teaching (emphasis on context), i.e. operated with live lectures, which had not happened on Western platforms. Therefore, the conviction that MOOC is a mirror of the culture in which it was created should be considered a myth. It is the MOOC platform that presents the interests of the administrators and owners. Platform owners differ in their goals: academic (general knowledge transfer becoming a thing of the past after the commercialization of Coursera and edX), marketing (focused on gaining customers and employees) or economic-political (XuetangX). For a MOOC to be useful to representatives of another culture, not only translation into another language is needed, but also a proper modification of learning objectives and methods.
References
Adam, A. (2019) Digital neocolonialism and massive open online courses (MOOCs): colonial pasts and neoliberal futures. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(3), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.41521.
Adham, R. S. & Lundqvist, K. O. (2015). MOOCs as a method of distance education in the Arab world – A review paper. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2015-0009.
Altbach, P. G. (2014). MOOCs as neocolonialism: who controls knowledge?. International Higher Education, 75, 5–7. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2014.75.5426.
Andersen, B. L., Na-songkhla, J., Hasse, C., Nordin, N., & Norman, H. (2018). Perceptions of authority in a massive open online course: An intercultural study. International Review of Education 64(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-018-9708-z.
Avramova, J. R., Dens, N., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2022). The effects of brand placement disclosures in fiction. Journal of Advertising 51(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1981499.
Azzura, M. (nd). Make interesting writing with storytelling & creative writing. Skill Academy. https://skillacademy.com/p/buat-tulisan-yang-menarik-dengan-storytelling-and-creative-writing?courseType=SingleCourse.
Bauer-Maglin, N. (2017). Mentoring at girls write now. Radical Teacher, 109(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2017.387.
Belleflamme, P. & Jacqmin, J. (2016). An Economic Appraisal of MOOC Platforms: Business Models and Impacts on Higher Education. CESifo Economic Studies, 62(1), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifv016.
Bo, F. (2022). Comprehensive English. Xuetangx https://www.xuetangx.com/course/xnkj05021007667
Intelintl/12464250?channel=i.area.manual_search.
Boggio, S. (2019, January 14). Professor Emeritus Kunihiko Nakajima [Waseda University Open Lecture Series] Japanese creative writing [Video]. You Tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubWJiSjaBWYv.Brokenmemories7. (2009, July 23). Japanese poetry – a project for creative writing [Video]. You
Tube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mF7E3Fgmrm8.
Burd, E. L., Smith, S. P. & Reisman, S. (2015). Exploring business models for MOOCs in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 40(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9297-0.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage. ISBN 978-1-4129-6557-6. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf.
De Waard, I., Gallagher, M. S., Zekezny-Green, R., Czerniewicz, L., Downes, S., Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Willems, J. (2014). Challenges for conceptualising EU MOOC for vulnerable learner groups. In U. Cress, C. Delgado Kloos (Eds.), Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2014 (pp. 33–42). ISSN / ISBN 978-84-8294-689-4. European Commission: Open Education Europa. http://repository.unmas.ac.id/medias/journal/EPR-0050.pdf.
Florene, U. (2021, January 25). Indonesian edtech platforms tap practical skills to maintain momentum. KrASIA. https://kr-asia.com/indonesian-edtech-platforms-tap-practical-skills-to-maintain-momentum.
Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class. The new global competition for talent. New York: Harper Business / Harper Collins Publishers. ISBN 10: 006075690X, ISBN 13: 9780060756901.
Gillani, N. & Eynon, R. (2014). Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18–26. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.05.004.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations. Software of the Mind.
Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw-Hill. 3rd edition. ISBN 978-0-07-177015-6. https://books.google.pl/books?id=o4OqTgV3V00C&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Honda, M. (2011). Creative writing in pairs: pedagogic possibilities in Japanese University EFL classes. Komaba Journal of English Education, 2, 45–63. http://park.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/eigo/KJEE/002/045-063.pdf.
Hongladarom, S. (2001). Global culture, local cultures, and the Internet: The Thai example. In C. Ess & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Culture, technology, communication: Towards an intercultural global village (pp. 307–324). ISBN-13: 978-0791450161. Albany, New York: States University of New York Press.
Howkins, J. (2002). The creative economy. How people make money from ideas. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 978014977041. https://books.google.pl/books?id=gWOtAAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=pl&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. London: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9780140267310. https://books.google.pl/books?id=Iq75qmi3Og8C&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=true.
Jacoby, J. (2014). The disruptive potential of the Massive Open Online Course: A literature review. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 18(1), 73–85. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079845.pdf.
JMOOC (nd.). JMOOC mission statement. https://www.jmooc.jp/en/about-us_en-2.
John (2013). Cultural awareness and differences in MOOCs. Learner Weblog, blog post, 27 April. https://suifaijohnmak.wordpress.com/2013/04/27/cultural-awareness-and-differences-in-moocs.
Kaliszewski, A. (2011). Literatura XX i XXI wieku w kształceniu dziennikarzy. Zarys problemu [Literature of the 20th and 21st centuries in the education of journalists. Outline of the problem]. In K. Wolny-Zmorzyński, W. Furman, & J. Snopek (Eds.), Dziennikarstwo a literatura w XX i XXI wieku [Journalism and literature in the 20th and 21st centuries]. Warszawa: Poltext. ISBN 978837561184.
Kalman, Y. M. (2014). A race to the bottom: MOOCs and higher education business models. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.922410.
Keskin, N. Ö., Waard, I. D., Koutropoulos, A., & Gallagher, M. S. (2017). National strategies for OER and MOOCs from 2010 to 2020: Canada, Japan, South Korea, Turkey, UK, and USA.
Administrative Leadership in Open and Distance Learning Programs, 188–212. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2645-2.ch008.
Leonie V. (2020). Review, 4 August. https://www.coursera.org/learn/write-your-first-novel/reviews.
Liu, S., Liang, T., Shao, S., & Kong, J. (2020). Evaluating localized MOOCs: The role of culture on interface design and user experience. IEEE Access, vol. 8, 107927–107940. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986036.
Liu, Z., Brown, R., Lynch, C.F., Barnes, T., Baker, R., Berger, Y., & McNamara, D. (2016). MOOC learner behaviors by country and culture; an exploratory analysis. In T. Barnes, M. Chi, & M. Feng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, EDM 2016 (pp. 127–134). Raleigh NC, United States. https://learninganalytics.upenn.edu/ryanbaker/paper121.pdf.
Malaquias de Oliveira, F. F. & Jorge de Silva Jr. R. (2020). Understanding cultural determinats of MOOCs offering: A cross-country study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 21(4), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.803405.
Mikułowski-Pomorski, J. (2003). Komunikacja między kulturowa. Wprowadzenie. [Intercultural communication. Introduction] Kraków: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Krakowie. 2nd edition. ISBN 83-7252-017-8.
Portmess, L. (2013). Mobile Knowledge, Karma Points and Digital Peers: The Tacit Epistemology and Linguistic Representation of MOOCs. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T23S30.
Shah, D. (2022, December 5). FutureLearn acquired by Global University Systems (GUS). Class Central. The Report. https://www.classcentral.com/report/gus-acquires-futurelearn.
Shirao, R. (2014). A pictogram that conveys meaning in shape. Gacco. https://lms.gacco.org/courses/gacco/ga015/2014_11/about.
Stager, J. (2016). Exploring the relationship between culture and participation in an Introduction to art MOOC (Doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, PA. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/28916.
Tan, C. & Wong, B. (2008). Classical traditions of education: Socrates and Confucius. In: Tan, C. (Ed.), Philosophical Reflections for Educators, (pp. 3–12). Singapore: Cengage Learning. ISBN-13 978-9814239769. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281202338_Classical_traditions_of_education_Socrates_and_Confucius.
Trzebiński, J. & Zięba, M. (2006). Narracyjne rozumienie innego człowieka a jakość więzi społecznych [Narrative understanding of another human being and the quality of social bonds]. Psychologia Jakości Życia [Psychology of Quality of Life], 2, 143–160. https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/964.
University of East Anglia (2020). Creative writing 50. World-class courses. Global voices. Future forms. https://issuu.com/uniofeastanglia/docs/cw50_digital_book.
Wang, J., Ramey, L., Wang, C., & Lixia, X. (2020). Creative writing. Xuetangx. https://www.xuetangx.com/course/hunnu05021003225intl/14799962?channel=i.area.manual_search.
Waseda University, School of Culture, Media and Society. (nd.). Creative writing and criticism. https://www.waseda.jp/flas/cms/en/about/theoretical/cwc.
Woźniak, T. (2005). Narracja w schizofrenii [Narration in schizophrenia]. Lublin: University of Maria Curie-Skłodowska Publishing. ISBN 83-227-2405-5.
Yamanaka, T. (2018). Theory of linguistics as Education: Language deceives us and make life difficult. Gacco. https://lms.gacco.org/courses/course-v1:gacco+ga125+2021_01/about.
Zhang, K., Bonk, C. J., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (2020). MOOCs and Open Education in the Global South. Successes and challenges, In: Zhang, K., Bonk, C. J., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (Eds.), MOOCS and Open Education in the Global South. Challenges, successes, and opportunities (1–14). New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-367-02576-2 (hbk), ISBN 978-0-367-02576-2 (pbk), ISBN 978-0-439-39891-9 (ebk).
Zhu, M., Sabir, N., Bonk, C.J., Sari, A., Xu, S., & Kim, M. (2020). Addressing learner cultural diversity in MOOC design and delivery: strategies and practices of experts. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 22(2), 1–25. ISSN: EISSN-1302-6488. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1290876.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
