E-tutors’ Understanding and Level of Confidence in Using a Technological Pedagogical Knowledge Model in Open Distance E-Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2024.10.1.08Keywords:
Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), Open Distance e-Learning (ODeL), e-tutors, constructivismAbstract
The article aimed to investigate the perspectives of e-tutors regarding the importance of Technological Pedagogical Knowledge in an Open Distance e-Learning Institution. The article employs a quantitative survey method to allow students to articulate their impressions of how e-tutors leverage their topic expertise to impart knowledge. The study includes 350 students who are enrolled in a module. Its objective was to gain insights, using quantitative analysis, into the techniques used by e-tutors in delivering content. During the delivery of content, e-tutors provided explanations and support for different viewpoints, taking into
account students’ input on the choice, execution, and overall impact of teaching methods. The collected data were arranged and presented in tables. E-tutors recognized the use of Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK) to assist and enhance online student activities. Therefore, it was found that constructivism could help to incorporate the TPK framework, thereby enhancing students’ understanding of the instructional design process. However, the study discovered a lack of comprehension among e-tutors regarding the TPK concept in relation to curriculum design.
References
Alhamid, I. S. G. & Mohammad-Salehi, B. (2024). Examining EFL teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and their attitudes towards online teaching. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 715‒733. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/article/view/270440.
Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed., pp. 15‒44). Athabasca University Press.
Alsayed, A.A. M., Razak, R.A., & Hasim, Z. (2022). Perceived competencies on TPACK among language teachers in Egypt. Jurnal Kurikulum and Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 10(1), 31‒39. E-ISSN:2289-3008.
Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed., pp. 150‒200). Cengage Learning.
Barak, M. (2014). Cloud technologies as means for promoting social constructivism in science teacher education courses. In EDULEARN14 Proceedings (pp. 3879‒3887). IATED.
Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47, 283‒303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y.
Bates, A.W. & Poole, G. (2003). Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education: Foundations for Success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468.
Cheng, P. H., Molina, J., Lin, M. C., Liu, H. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2022). A new TPCK training model for tackling the ongoing challenges of COVID-19. Applied System Innovation, 5(32), 2‒19. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5020032.
Coker, H., Harper, T., Campbell, L., Tonner-Saunders, S., Waghorn, L., & Robertson, D. (2024). Developing digital literacies in teacher education: a collaborative enquiry examining teacher educators’ experiences of teaching online during the pandemic. Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 15(1), 1‒17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1416182.pdf.
Ferdiansyah, D.S., Patmanthara, S., & Suswanto, H. (2022). Evaluation of Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPACK) of SMK Negeri 6 Malang (case study) of electrical power installation engineering and autotronic engineering. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 27. 70‒82. ISSN: 2668‒7798.
Fihlo, R.A., & Gitirana, V. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ knowledge: an analysis of teacher education situation based on TPACK. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 19(2), 594‒631. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1565.
Foulger, T. S., Jin, Y., Mourlam, D. J., & Ebersole, L. (2022). Equitable access to TPACK research: tensions about using social media to disseminate scholarship. Computers in Education, 3, 1‒13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100067.
Gao, X. (2024). Research on the Integration Strategy of Secondary School Teaching and Information Technology in the Background of Internet. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1): 1‒20. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01697.
Guzmán González, J. R. & Vesga Bravo, G. J. (2024). TPACK in in-service secondary education teachers: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 12(1), 282‒296. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3198.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and learning activity types; Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393‒416. https://doi.org/10/1080/15391523.2009.10782536.
He, M., Ratanaolarn, T., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2024). Design and Implementation of Online Gaming for Learning Motivation and Achievement Improvement in Computer Information Technology Curriculum. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 21, 268‒280. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2024.
Imaduddin, M. & Astuti, A. P. (2022). Strengthening chemistry teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge through the introduction of augmented reality Learning Management Systems. Bulletin of Community Engagement, 2(1), 21‒31. https://attractivejournal.com.index.php/bce/.
Jamieson, S. (2004) Likert scales: how to (ab)use them? Medical Education, 38(12), 1217‒1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x.
Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. Springer.
Kastorff, T. & Stegmann, K. (2024). Teachers’ technological (pedagogical) knowledge–predictors for students’ ICT literacy? In Frontiers in Education, 9(1), 1‒10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1264894.
Keramati, A., Keramati, M. R., & Arefian, M. H. (2024). Students’ reflection on the effect of collaborative learning on the learning environment and academic achievement in online reflective platforms, Reflective Practice, 25:2, 117‒131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2305868.
Karsenti, T., Traore, D., Mbangwana, T., & Merritt-Harper, T. (2009). The Pan-African research agenda on the pedagogical integration of ICT. http://www.oecd.org/site/progresskorea/44097541.pdf.
Knezek, G., Hopper, S. B., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., & Gibson, D. C. (2015). Assessing pedagogical balance in a simulated classroom environment. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(4), 148‒159. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2015.105501.
Langelesse, L-M., & Ukhova, N. (2023). E-tutor tandems in a COIL Course – design, implementation, and evaluation. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 9 (1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2023.9.1.06.
Lee, S. C. N. & Ogawa, C. (2021). Online learning self-efficacy- how English teachers feel during the Covid-19 pandemic. Indonesian Tesol Journal. 3(1), 1‒17. http://ejournal.iainpalopo.ac.id/index.php/ITJ/index.
Li, M., Vale, C., Tan, H., & Blannin, J. (2024). Exploring Technological Pedagogical Readiness (TPR) in China’s primary mathematics teachers: TPR scale validation. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7), 1‒20. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/14727.
Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioural intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864‒873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005.
Lyublinskaya, I. & Kaplon-Schillis, A. (2022). Analysis of Differences in the Levels of TPACK: Unpacking Performance Indicators in the TPACK Levels Rubric. Education Sciences 12. 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020079.
Ma, K., Chitiyami, M., Zhang, Y., & Nicoll, S. (2021). Online teaching self-efficacy during COVID-19: Changes, its associated factors and moderators. Education and Information Technologies, 26: 6675‒6697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10486-3.
Madanat, H., Ab Rashid, R., Hashmi, U. M., Alqaryouti, M. H., Mohamed, M., & Al Smadi, O. A. (2024). Jordanian English language educators’ perceived readiness for virtual learning environment. Heliyon, 10(4), e25766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25766.
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technology pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017‒1054. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for integrating technology in teachers’ knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017‒1054.
Mohammad-Salehi, B. & Vaez-Dalili, M. (2022). Examining EFL teachers’ perceptions of technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Web 2.0 technologies using a structural equation modelling technique. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 9(2), 51‒76. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2021.14550.1779.
Mutmainnah, R. & Nurkamilah, S. (2021). Biology teachers’ TPACK in their instructional planning for online-based practical work. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 5(2), 111‒125. https://doi.org/10.24252/1p.2022v25n1i14.
Nguyen, G. N. H., Bower, M., & Stevenson, M. (2022). The discourse of design: patterns of TPACK contribution during pre-service teacher learning design conversations. Education Information Technologies. 27: 8235‒8264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10932-w.
Nsouli, R. & Vlachopoulos, D. (2021). Attitudes of nursing faculty members toward technology and e-learning in Lebanon. BMC Nursing, 20, 1‒15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00638-8.
Nuruzzakiah, N., Hasanuddin, N., Artika, W., Supriatno, S., & Rahmatan, S.H. (2022). Competency analysis of Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPACK) biology teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidika IPA, 8(1), 325‒335. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i1.1166.
Ogalo, M. O., Omulando, C., & Barasa, P. (2022). Assessment of Teachers’ Pedagogical and Pedagogical Knowledge of integrating ICT in teaching English in secondary schools in Nairobi County Kenya. Scholars Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(1), 9‒23. https://doi.org/10.36347/sjahss.2022.v10i0.003.
Oikarinen, R. M., Oikarinen, J. K., Havu-Nuutinen, S., & Pontinen, S. (2022). Students’ collaboration in technology-enhanced reciprocal peer tutoring as an approach towards learning mathematics. Education and Information Technologies. 27: 7519‒7548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10799-3.
Radmehr, F. & Goodchild, S. (2022). Switching to fully online teaching and learning of mathematics: The case of Norwegian mathematics lecturers and university students during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 8: 581‒611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00162-9.
Setiawardani, W. (2024). Phenomenology Study: Higher Education Students Digital Literacy in Society 5.0. Kurdish Studies, 12(2), 4177‒4186. https://doi.org/10.58262/ks.v12i2.307.
Shofiyyah, N. A., Komarudin, T. S., Muharam, A., & Juita, D. R. (2024). Characteristics of Generation Z and Its Impact on Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(1), 5655‒5668. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v8i1.13298.
Sun, P. P. & Zhang, L. J. (2024). Investigating the effects of Chinese university students’ online engagement on their EFL learning outcomes. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1‒11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00800-7.
Taek, P., Madu, A., & Liunima, I. (2024). Analysis of the Ability of Technological, Pedagogical, Content, Knowledge Of Senior High School Teachers In Developing Learning Tools. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 11(3), 10‒21. https://doi.org/10.53555/sfs.v11i3.2232.
Tafazoli, D. & Meihami, H. (2022). Narrative inquiry for CALL teacher preparation programmes amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: language teachers’ technological needs and suggestions. Journal of Computational Education, 10(1), 63‒187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00227-x.
Tanyi, M. A. (2022). The digital environment and English didactics in the age of COVID-19 in public secondary schools in Cameroon. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 54‒64. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-10-1-6.
Trochim, W. M. & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). Research Methods Knowledge Base. 3. ed. Mason, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing, 361.
Ungar, O. A., Leshem, B., Margaliot, A., & Grobgeld, E. (2018). Faculty use of the active learning classroom: Barriers and facilitators. Journal of Information Technology Education Research, 17, 485‒504. https://doi.org/10.28945/4142.
Vanacore, K., Ottmar, E., Liu, A., & Sales, A. (2024). Remote monitoring of implementation fidelity using log-file data from multiple online learning platforms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1‒21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2303025.
Wea, T. N. & Budiraharjo, M. (2022). Investigating the NTT teachers in facing the online teaching challenges. ELS journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(1), 93‒100. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v5i1.19727.
Wu, Y. T., Chai, C. S., & Wang, L. J. (2022). Exploring secondary school teachers’ TPACK for video-based flipped learning: the role of pedagogical beliefs. Education and Information Technologies, 27: 8793‒8819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10977-x.
Zhang, M. & Chen, S. (2022). Modelling dichotomous technology use among university EFL teachers in China: the roles of TPACK, affective and evaluative attitudes towards technology. Congent Education, 9(3), 1‒24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2013396.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
