Exploring the Educational Efficacy and Potential of 24-Hour Hackathon Programming Marathon – HackEmotion

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2024.10.1.07

Keywords:

Hackathon, Work in teams, Emotions recognition, STEM education, Programming marathon

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of modern didactics and student motivation for self-learning as well as tackling significant practical challenges. In technical and STEAM education, achieving high levels of motivation is particularly important, as students often become overwhelmed by the vast amount of information and opportunities which lead to diminished interest. At the Institute of Computer Science at the University of Silesia in Katowice, a Hackathon – a 24-hour programming marathon – was organized to enhance student engagement. During this event, students confronted a critical problem in modern societye: emotion recognition. The goal was to develop solutions and help for fostering emotion recognition skills in young people with real-world implementation potential. Additionally, students tested their abilities under time pressure, honed their group work competencies, and faced real-time problem-solving scenarios. This paper presents an evaluation of the event’s impact and analyzes the results of a post-event survey, providing feedback to improve the quality of future Hackathons. The main research questions we posed during the research were: RQ1: At what level of quality was the Hackathon event organized? Whether students were well informed and felt cared for during this event? RQ2: What aspects and properties motivate students most to take part in events organized at the university like Hackathon? RQ3: What competencies, knowledge and skills were developed by participants in the Hackathon? RQ4: Do students consider issues related to recognizing emotions important and the created applications possible to use in practice? In this paper, we answer these questions using statistical analysis as well as simple machine learning models.   

References

Attard, C., Berger, N., & Mackenzie, E. (2021). The positive influence of inquiry-based learning teacher professional learning and industry partnerships on student engagement with STEM. Frontiers in Education, 6, 693221. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.693221.

Baran, M., Baran, M., Karakoyun, F., & Maskan, A. (2021). The influence of project-based STEM (PjbL-STEM) applications on the development of 21st century skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 798–815.

Beretta, M., Obwegeser, N., & Bauer, S. (2022). An exploration of hackathons as time intense and collaborative forms of crowdsourcing. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3174712.

Diana, N. & Sukma, Y. (2021). The effectiveness of implementing project-based learning (PjBL) model in STEM education: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012146. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012146.

Garcia, M. B. (2022). Hackathons as extracurricular activities: Unraveling the motivational orientation behind student participation. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(6), 1903–1918. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22564.

Hacıoğlu, Y. & Gülhan, F. (2021). The effects of STEM education on the students’ critical thinking skills and STEM perceptions. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 7(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.771331.

Kong, S. C. & Yang, Y. (2024). A Human-Centred Learning and Teaching Framework Using Generative Artificial Intelligence for Self-Regulated Learning Development through Domain Knowledge Learning in K–12 Settings. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3392830.

Longmeier, M. M., Dotson, D. S., & Armstrong, J. N. (2022). Fostering a tech culture through campus collaborations: A case study of a hackathon and library partnership. Science & Technology Libraries, 41(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1963388.

McCollum, B. M. (2020). Online collaborative learning in STEM. In Active Learning in College Science: The Case for Evidence-Based Practice (pp. 621–637). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_38.

Pe-Than, E. P. P., Nolte, A., Filippova, A., Bird, C., Scallen, S., & Herbsleb, J. (2022). Corporate hackathons, how and why? A multiple case study of motivation, projects proposal and selection, goal setting, coordination, and outcomes. Human–Computer Interaction, 37(4), 281–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2020.1760869.

Prince, M., Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2020). Active student engagement in online STEM classes: Approaches and recommendations. Advances in Engineering Education, 8(4), 1–25.

Rehmat, A. P. & Hartley, K. (2020). Building engineering awareness: Problem based learning approach for STEM integration. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28636.

Salam, M. & Farooq, M. S. (2020). Does sociability quality of web-based collaborative learning information system influence students’ satisfaction and system usage? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00189-z.

Videla, R., Aguayo, C., & Veloz, T. (2021). From STEM to STEAM: An enactive and ecological continuum. Frontiers in Education, 6, 709560. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.709560.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-07

How to Cite

Przybyła-Kasperek, M., Doroz, R., Lisowska, A., Machnik, G., Nowakowski, A., Wróbel, K., & Zielosko, B. (2024). Exploring the Educational Efficacy and Potential of 24-Hour Hackathon Programming Marathon – HackEmotion. International Journal of Research in E-Learning, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.31261/IJREL.2024.10.1.07

Issue

Section

Articles