Collectivist Logic in Comparative Genocide Studies and in the Battles for Memory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31261/NoZ.2020.06.04Keywords:
historical comparative analysis, genocides, genocide studies, politics of memoryAbstract
The article aims to present the mechanisms of collectivist logic as it functions in three areas: (1) in the historical comparative analysis of genocides – the basic method of genocide
studies; (2) in the activities of the organizations of victims and survivors, as well as in actions undertaken by animal rights activists; (3) in nationalist discourses and in the politics of memory. Collectivist logic is a set of operations that address human communities – groups of individuals linked together by significant social bonds and interests, and perceived as culturally distinctive – as the subject of history. As a result of the application of such logic, we may think about collective guilt and collective merit. The article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of historical comparative analysis as an essential methodological tool of genocide studies. The argument further focuses upon the use of the symbolic capital attributed to the term “genocide” in studies involving analyses comparing other crimes – as well as the industrial exploitation of animals – to genocides. Finally, the author describes the relationship between the state policy of memory, nationalist discourses, and the academic integrity of genocide scholars.
References
Adorno T.W.: Minima Moralia. Reflections from Damaged Life. Trans. E.F.N. Jephcott. London 1999.
Alexander J.C.: The Meanings of Social Life. A Cultural Sociology. Oxford 2005.
Alexander J.C.: Znaczenia społeczne. Studia z socjologii kulturowej. Trans. S. Burdziej, J. Gądecki. Kraków 2010.
Anderson R.: “Redressing Colonial Genocide under International Law: The Hereros’ Cause of Action against Germany.” California Law Review 2005, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 1155‒1189.
Archer M.: Culture and Agency. The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge 1996.
Assmann A.: “Fünf Strategien der Verdrängung.” In: Der lange Schatten der Vergangenheit Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik. München 2006.
Bartrop P.R., Totten S.: “The History of Genocide: An Overview.” In: S. Totten (ed.): Teaching about Genocide: Issues, Approaches, and Resources. Greenwich 2004.
Bauer Y.: Rethinking the Holocaust. New Haven 2002.
Bauman Z.: Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca, N.Y. 1989.
Blick J.P.: “Genocidal Warfare in Tribal Societies as a Result of European-Induced Culture Conflict.” Man (New Series) 1988, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 654‒670.
Bringing Them Home. National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. Sydney 1997.
Calhoun C.: “Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 1998, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 846‒871.
Campbell B.: “Contradictory Behavior During Genocides.” Sociological Forum 2010, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 296‒314.
Czyżewski M.: “W stronę teorii dyskursu publicznego.” In: M. Czyżewski, S. Kowalski, A. Piotrowski (eds.): Rytualny chaos. Studium dyskursu publicznego. Warszawa 2010.
Diamond J.: Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York‒London 1999.
Głowacka D.: Po tamtej stronie: świadectwo, afekt, wyobraźnia. Warszawa 2016.
Harff B., Gurr T.R.: “Systematic Early Earning of Humanitarian Emergencies.” Journal of Peace Research 1998, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 551–579.
Harff B.: “No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder since 1955.” American Political Science Review 2003, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 57–73.
Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future. Summary of the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada 2015.
Hooper C.: Tall Man: The Death of Doomadgee. New York 2009.
Hooper C.: Wysoki. Śmierć Camerona Doomadgee. Trans. A. Nowakowska. Wołowiec 2010.
Lemkin R.: Axis Rule in Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation, Analysis of Government, Proposals for Redress. Washington 1944.
Loba M.: “Zagłada, ofiara i zwierzęta w myśli Elisabeth de Fontenay.” Narracje o Zagładzie 2017, no. 3, pp. 42‒50.
Mann M.: The Dark Side of Democracy. Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. Cambridge 2006.
MacDonald D.B.: Balkan Holocausts? Serbian and Croatian Victim Centred Propaganda and the War in Yugoslavia. Manchester 2002.
MacDonald D.B., Hudson G.: “The Genocide Question and Indian Residential Schools in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique 2012, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 427‒449.
McDoom O.S.: “Who Killed in Rwanda’s Genocide? Micro-space, Social Influence and Individual Participation in Intergroup Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 2013, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 453‒467.
Melson R.F.: Revolution and Genocide. On the Origins of the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust. Chicago‒London 1992.
Moses A.D.: “Revisiting a Founding Assumption of Genocide Studies.” Genocide Studies and Prevention 2011, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 287–300.
Nijakowski L.M.: Rozkosz zemsty. Socjologia historyczna mobilizacji ludobójczej. Warszawa 2013.
Olędzka J.: “Relatywizacja ludobójstwa jako instrument stosunków geopolitycznych na przykładzie politycznego dyskursu o ludobójstwach Ormian i Czerkiesów.” In: B. Machul-Telus, U. Markowska-Manista, L.M. Nijakowski (eds.): Krwawy cień genocydu. Część 2. Ludobójstwa ‒ pamięć, dyskurs, edukacja. Warszawa 2017, pp. 129‒153.
Ostrowska J.: Przemilczane. Seksualna praca przymusowa w czasie II wojny światowej. Warzawa 2018.
Patterson Ch.: Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust. New York 2002.
Singer P.: Animal Liberation. New York 2002.
Skocpol T.: Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge 1994.
Spivak G.Ch.: Death of a Discipline. New York 2003.
Talewicz-Kwiatkowska J.: “Holokaust Romów. Czy rzeczywiście zapomniany?” Nigdy Więcej 2016, no. 22, nigdywiecej.org/pdf/pismo/22/holocaust_romow.pdf [accessed: 20.09.2020].
Van Leeuwen T.: “The Representation of Social Actors.” In: C.R. Caldas-Coulthard, M. Coulthard (eds.): Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London–New York 1996.
Welzer H.: “On Killing and Morality: How Normal People Become Mass Murderers.” In: O. Jensen, C. Szejnmann (eds.): Ordinary People as Mass Murderers. Perpetrators in Comparative Perspectives. London 2008.
Welzer H.: Täter: Wie aus ganz normalen Menschen Massenmörder werden, with M. Christ. Frankfurt am Main 2005.
Wenklar M.: “Polacy w niemieckiej policji pomocniczej. Schutzmannschaftsbataillon 202 w świetle zeznań jego członków.” Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis 2012, no. 3505, Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem 34, no. 4, Wrocław 2012, pp. 35–50.
Wodak R., Cillia R. de, Reisigl M., Liebhart K.: The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Trans. A. Hirsch, R. Mitten. Edinburgh 2003.
Woolford A., Wolejszo S.: “Collecting on Moral Debts: Reparations for the Holocaust and Pořajmos.” Law & Society Review 2006, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 871‒901.
Żółkoś M.: “Insektosemityzm.” Narracje o Zagładzie 2017, no. 3, pp. 51‒65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Copyright Owners of the submitted texts grant the Reader the right to use the pdf documents under the provisions of the Creative Commons 4.0 International License: Attribution-Share-Alike (CC BY-SA). The user can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose.
1. License
The University of Silesia Press provides immediate open access to journal’s content under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Authors who publish with this journal retain all copyrights and agree to the terms of the above-mentioned CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author/s.
If the article contains illustrative material (drawings, photos, graphs, maps), the author declares that the said works are of his authorship, they do not infringe the rights of the third party (including personal rights, i.a. the authorization to reproduce physical likeness) and the author holds exclusive proprietary copyrights. The author publishes the above works as part of the article under the licence "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International".
ATTENTION! When the legal situation of the illustrative material has not been determined and the necessary consent has not been granted by the proprietary copyrights holders, the submitted material will not be accepted for editorial process. At the same time the author takes full responsibility for providing false data (this also regards covering the costs incurred by the University of Silesia Press and financial claims of the third party).
3. User Rights
Under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, the users are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit the contribution) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the article for any purpose, provided they attribute the contribution in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
4. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
I hereby declare that in the event of withdrawal of the text from the publishing process or submitting it to another publisher without agreement from the editorial office, I agree to cover all costs incurred by the University of Silesia in connection with my application.
