Er(r)go,
a remarkable twist: respect for the Other and a desire for the Good of the Other give birth to hypocrisy, and violence befalls language. The beauty of heteroglossia is reprimanded as aesthetics of violence: the violence directed at one who is aggrieved by language. The intentions are good and tolerance is their purpose—it is just that the seed of the paradox is embedded in the very nucleus of that intention: the pressure of interdiction and self-censorship easily breaches the boundary of ethical necessity and itself becomes intolerance. We are entering a realm of oxymoronic ethics, which can hardly be justified even by the unavoidably metaphorical character of language; an abused metaphor quickly turns into a lie. There is an advantage to it, however: an insight into political correctness induces an awareness that a lie cannot be considered in terms of a dichotomy; a lie is designated by a co-ordinate upon an extensive scale whose one extreme is the truth—a co-ordinate which is, regrettably, excessively mobile.
Political correctness: to what extent is this sensitivity towards the Other an extension of the power of the dominant discourse; dominant not necessarily in the political sense, but rather in the sphere of what may be called the terror of the margin? Does multiculturalism inevitably result in moving this critical co-ordinate towards the dangerous end of the scale? Is it not, in fact, an attempt at a reduction of all differences into submissive variants, which may easily be subdued to the only correct way of thinking? Would not changes in the ideological configuration of the humanities result in changes of the criteria of what is to be correct (we return here to the rhetoric of the evident)? Can simple-mindedness in thinking be justified with the comfort of the Other? What about the Third, who listens apprehensively to the monologue of the currently befitting discourse? Aren’t we witnessing a spiral of correctness, where an objection against one begins to turn into another? Or yet another paradox: aren’t we, in fact, dealing with an amputation of otherness which is being subdued to one’s languages and one’s systems of representations, instead of being given the right to radical difference and negotiated with? Aren’t these only correct postulates a ground for new exclusions? Finally, has not political correctness, through its excessive zeal, itself created instruments for undermining ethically suitable actions? How does the spotlight of political correctness influence the acting of an individual subject? Or perhaps it is all worth it? The papers contained within this issue attempt to answer those and similar questions—attempt…
Wojciech Kalaga
No. 49 (2024)
Published: 2024-12-30